Cherry-picking Python Portable Date Type#38163
Cherry-picking Python Portable Date Type#38163ahmedabu98 wants to merge 5 commits intoapache:release-2.73from
Conversation
|
R: @Amar3tto |
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request implements a new 'Date' logical type within the Apache Beam Python SDK to improve handling of date-related data types. It also updates the Managed Iceberg integration tests to use more robust catalog configurations and includes necessary infrastructure adjustments to trigger relevant test suites. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. Footnotes
|
|
Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment |
|
@ahmedabu98 please check this before merging: #34809 (comment) |
|
Replied in that bug. We should be good to go with this |
CP for #38078