Skip to content

[Improvement-18249][DAO] Route QueueMapper access through QueueDao#18263

Merged
SbloodyS merged 2 commits into
apache:devfrom
ruanwenjun:dao/queue
May 19, 2026
Merged

[Improvement-18249][DAO] Route QueueMapper access through QueueDao#18263
SbloodyS merged 2 commits into
apache:devfrom
ruanwenjun:dao/queue

Conversation

@ruanwenjun
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Was this PR generated or assisted by AI?

YES, gpt 5.5

Purpose of the pull request

Introduce QueueDao so the api layer depends only on the repository abstraction. The Dao exposes queryQueuePaging, queryQueueName, and existQueue (boolean via Boolean.TRUE.equals) so callers drop the == Boolean.TRUE dance.

QueueServiceImpl#deleteQueueById switches from int delete + delete <= 0 to !queueDao.deleteById(id) for the missing-row guard.

Tracking issue: #18249

Brief change log

Verify this pull request

This pull request is code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This pull request is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(or)

Pull Request Notice

Pull Request Notice

If your pull request contains incompatible change, you should also add it to docs/docs/en/guide/upgrade/incompatible.md

@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun self-assigned this May 14, 2026
@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun added improvement make more easy to user or prompt friendly refactor labels May 14, 2026
@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun added this to the 3.4.2 milestone May 14, 2026
@ruanwenjun ruanwenjun force-pushed the dao/queue branch 5 times, most recently from 6acb420 to a3d9a62 Compare May 18, 2026 09:58
Introduce QueueDao so the api layer depends only on the repository
abstraction. The Dao exposes queryQueuePaging, queryQueueName, and
existQueue (boolean via Boolean.TRUE.equals) so callers drop the
== Boolean.TRUE dance.

QueueServiceImpl#deleteQueueById switches from int delete + delete <= 0
to !queueDao.deleteById(id) for the missing-row guard.

Tracking issue: apache#18249
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
0.0% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 60%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@SbloodyS SbloodyS left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@SbloodyS SbloodyS merged commit 376d214 into apache:dev May 19, 2026
121 of 123 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backend improvement make more easy to user or prompt friendly refactor test

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants