fix(api): adjust Webhook creation example#2230
Merged
Conversation
The actorId in the webhook condition contained a name, not an ID. This is misleading as we don't support names.
fnesveda
approved these changes
Feb 6, 2026
|
Preview for this PR was built for commit |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The actorId in the webhook condition contained a name, not an ID. This is misleading as we don't support names.
Note
Low Risk
Documentation-only change to an OpenAPI example payload; no runtime behavior or API schema is modified.
Overview
Fixes the
Create webhookOpenAPI example payload to use an actualactorIdvalue instead of ausername~actor-nameidentifier in theconditionobject, avoiding misleading documentation about supported identifiers during webhook creation.Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 6eb8bb2. Configure here.