test: Use forked process for surefire tests #39540
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the Maven Surefire Plugin configuration in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Maven as Maven Build
participant Plugin as Surefire Plugin
participant JVM as JVM Instance
Maven->>Plugin: Parse pom.xml with new configurations
Plugin->>JVM: Launch 4 separate JVMs (forkCount=4)
JVM->>Plugin: Execute test and terminate (reuseForks=false)
Plugin->>Maven: Return test results
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
github-actions
bot
added
skip-changelog
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/server/pom.xml (1)
109-110: Optimize Test Isolation with Forked JVMs
The introduction of<forkCount>4</forkCount>and<reuseForks>false</reuseForks>clearly meets the PR objective by isolating each test class in its own JVM. This ensures a clean test environment, reducing the risk of side effects between tests. However, please verify that using a fixed fork count of 4 is suitable for all CI environments—if resource availability is variable, a dynamic setting (like1Cfor one fork per available core) might be worth considering.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/server/pom.xml(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: server-unit-tests / server-unit-tests
Failed server tests
|
|
This PR has not seen activitiy for a while. It will be closed in 7 days unless further activity is detected. |
Description
Tip
Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).
Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.
Fixes #
Issue Numberor
Fixes
Issue URLWarning
If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.
Automation
/ok-to-test tags=""
🔍 Cypress test results
Caution
If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit