UPSTREAM PR #2000: Fix signed/unsigned mismatch warning with msvc

[loci-dev]

Mirrored from abseil/abseil-cpp#2000

absl\time\internal\cctz\src\time_zone_name_win.cc(134,12): warning C4018: '>': signed/unsigned mismatch

[loci-review]

Based on the analysis results, no functions were identified with meaningful performance changes between the base and target versions. The function insights for both response time and throughput time returned empty results, indicating that the code changes did not produce significant performance impacts.

This suggests that the modifications between versions either had negligible effects on execution time, or the changes were primarily non-performance-related (such as code refactoring, documentation updates, or minor bug fixes that did not alter the execution characteristics of the codebase).

Without identifiable performance deltas in any functions, there are no meaningful performance changes to report between these two versions.

See the complete breakdown in Version Insights
Have questions? Tag @loci-dev to ask about this PR.

[noamshiovits-Aurora]

@loci-dev Explain why there are 0 changes in response or throughput times ..

[loci-review]

This repository isn’t linked to a LOCI project yet. Please create a new project or select an existing one in the LOCI dashboard and link it to this repository to access the chat agent.

[boristanchovski-al]

@loci-dev Hi

[loci-review]

This repository isn’t linked to a LOCI project yet. Please create a new project or select an existing one in the LOCI dashboard and link it to this repository to access the chat agent.

[Melisa-aurora]

@loci-dev Hi

[loci-review]

Hello! 👋 I'm Loci, your performance analysis assistant.

I've reviewed the performance analysis for this pull request, and the good news is that no significant performance changes were detected between the base and target versions. This means your code changes haven't introduced any meaningful performance regressions or improvements in terms of execution time.

How can I help you today? I can:

• Explain the analysis results in more detail
• Investigate specific functions you're curious about (flame graphs, control flow graphs, or performance metrics)
• Examine the source code changes to understand what was modified
• Answer questions about the performance metrics or analysis methodology
• Provide insights on any particular aspect of the changes

What would you like to explore?