improv(ci): removed the secret inheritance and replaced with the needed secrets

[sdangol]

Summary

This PR replaces the places where a secret was inherited to a reusable workflow and instead passes the secrets that are only required which was flagged by SonarQube.

Changes

Please provide a summary of what's being changed

Changed the workflows which call a reusable workflow to not inherit all the secrets and passed the secrets which are only required.

Please add the issue number below, if no issue is present the PR might get blocked and not be reviewed

Issue number: closes #4363

---

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Disclaimer: We value your time and bandwidth. As such, any pull requests created on non-triaged issues might not be successful.

[sthulb]

I'd probably use a more descriptive name though than TOKEN – TOKEN_GITHUB maybe

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[dreamorosi]

I checked out the branch and noticed that some of the secrets are getting flagged by linting

Can we check if it's fine to leave as is or there's a better way?

[sdangol]

@dreamorosi I think it's because we need to pass in the correct environment for this. Do you know which environment these secrets are scoped to?

[dreamorosi]

Should be Docs

[sdangol]

@dreamorosi I tried adding the environment there, but the linter then complains that the property is not allowed. It seems like when using reusable workflows, we don't define the environments in the calling workflow.

Maybe the warning is because of this issue with the extension and is a false positive?