Fix issue #52: Handle AST variable opts in macros #53
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Fixes #52 by properly handling field options when they are passed as variables in macro contexts.
Problem
When field options (
opts) are passed as variables in macro contexts, they become AST variable references (tuples like{:opts, [], Module}) instead of literal keyword lists. The original code insyntax_sugar.ex:46calledKeyword.drop/2directly onopts, which failed with aFunctionClauseErrorwhenoptswas an AST tuple.Solution
Modified
TypedEctoSchema.SyntaxSugar.transform_expression/2to:optsis a compile-time keyword list usingKeyword.keyword?/1Changes
lib/typed_ecto_schema/syntax_sugar.exto handle both compile-time and runtime optsCLAUDE.mdwith development guidelinesTest Plan
mix formatBackward Compatibility
✅ Fully backward compatible - existing usage with literal keyword lists works exactly as before, with the same compile-time optimization.