Bugfix/unexpected state on success

[elewis2]

Changes check on whether report has loaded in reports-async to look for presence of an 'ident' field instead of checking the 'state' field (which can contain states from bullmq about the status of the report loading process, or can contain states about the report creation and review process).

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 31.57895% with 13 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 86.18%. Comparing base (215bf83) to head (d785a1a).

Files	Patch %	Lines
pori_python/ipr/connection.py	31.57%	13 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop       #9   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    86.18%   86.18%           
========================================
  Files           19       19           
  Lines         2157     2157           
========================================
  Hits          1859     1859           
  Misses         298      298           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	86.18% <31.57%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[dustinbleile]

Should we do a single black or ruff linting commit?

[elewis2]

Should we do a single black or ruff linting commit?

yes, sounds good to me!