add badge to readme for target standard

[JeffGarland]

No description provided.

[JeffGarland]

This repo is the clearest about target although if 29 extensions appear here this will get interesting. Badges are new and going into all repos

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 16027222384

Details

• 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

---

Totals
Change from base Build 16000156710:	0.0%
Covered Lines:	304
Relevant Lines:	304

---

💛 - Coveralls

[steve-downey]

It's on target for 26, but also currently builds with 20 (or will as soon as I merge the constexpr fix PR), although there's some polyfill concepts to approximate the dangling check which were added in 23.

What question are we trying to answer?

[JeffGarland]

It's on target for 26, but also currently builds with 20 (or will as soon as I merge the constexpr fix PR), although there's some polyfill concepts to approximate the dangling check which were added in 23.

What question are we trying to answer?

What version of c++ the library is targeting -- not the minimum level supported. About 1/2 the repos are 26 libraries (all accepted at this point of course) and the other are 29. The badge is meant to 'see that at a glance'

[JeffGarland]

@steve-downey would you have an objection if I moved the license block down to the bottom of the readme as a driveby? The current form of exemplar emphasizes the usage up front which makes sense to me.

https://github.com/bemanproject/exemplar

[neatudarius]

LGTM, ship it!

[JeffGarland]

@steve-downey would you have an objection if I moved the license block down to the bottom of the readme as a driveby? The current form of exemplar emphasizes the usage up front which makes sense to me.

https://github.com/bemanproject/exemplar

I've gone ahead and made the change so you can see what it looks like in preview....

[JeffGarland]

I've gone ahead and made the change so you can see what it looks like in preview....

Ok this is only a 12 hour grace period, but I'm merging. @steve-downey if you don't like it ping me and I'll move it back, but I believe it's more consistent with current examplar this way.

CI fail btw is some internet issue, nothing in the PR obviously