Update README.md - and attempt to satisfy ci and remove exemplar cruft #1
Conversation
Very simple merge of README file from first SCOPE project
- remove the identity boilerplate - drop in the un-merged readme content from original scope repo - indicate header only library
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
JeffGarland
changed the title
This reverts commit 894f73b.
robert-andrzejuk
force-pushed
the
scope1-transfer
branch
from
3722cbe to
be25679
Compare
JeffGarland
left a comment
JeffGarland
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm approving this review. @robert-andrzejuk anytime you're ready to merge to main I'm good. This looks like a good enough line to snap as a starting point
Are we going to worry about the lint checks, clang-format checks, etc?? |
robert-andrzejuk
requested review from
bretbrownjr,
camio,
dietmarkuehl,
neatudarius,
steve-downey and
wusatosi
as code owners
|
The checks are a little over the top in my view. I started a thread about it in discourse bc most of these things like whitespace in markdown I think don't matter for any flavor of markdown? In which case, why should we check that? The code formatting is another matter -- we'll want to fix that at some point, but I care more about getting something compiling for the moment. |
Very simple merge of README file from first SCOPE project