Use iterator_interface instead of proxy_iterator_interface for code_unit_view #15
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…nit_view The intent of using proxy_iterator_interface is to provide an operator-> implementation for these iterators, but we don't want one here; there are no member functions on charN_t that could be invoked, and the precedent in std::ranges::transform_view<V,F>::@*iterator*@ is to omit operator->.
Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 11824113035Details
💛 - Coveralls |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The intent of using proxy_iterator_interface is to provide an operator-> implementation for these iterators, but we don't want one here; there are no member functions on charN_t that could be invoked, and the precedent in std::ranges::transform_view<V,F>::@iterator@ is to omit operator->.