Add SSE article for ZFP

[markcmiller86]

This is the promised article about software sustainability engineering on ZFP. @lindstro reviewed and approved earlier today though I will leave open the possibility that a few small changes may still be needed before publication on bssw.io.

Be sure to select main as the base branch above as the target for this PR.

Provide a general summary of your changes in the title above.

Fill in the below Description section with minimal text describing the changes/new contributions in this PR and replace <...> as appropriate.

Any checklist items that do not apply can be striken out by adding ~~ to the beginning and end of the checklist item as * ~~[] <checklist-item>~~.
Also, remove the strikeout markers ~~ for the wikize_refs.py checklist items if using formal citations for bssw.io contributions.

Description

EB Member: @rinkug

PR checklist for files displayed on bssw.io site

• [Author] @mention the BSSw.io editorial board member @<eb-member-id> in Description above assigned to shepherd your PR.
• [ ] [Author] Add the <issue-id> in the Description above for the associated GitHub Issue.
• [ ] [Author] Ensure wikize_refs.py -i <base>.md is run and commit (if using wikize_refs.py).
• [Author] Inspect the content in the *.md file(s) as rendered in GitHub for this PR.
• [EB Mem] Assign this PR to the EB member <eb-member-id>.
• [EB Mem] Assign this PR to the author of the PR <pr-author-id>.
• [EB Mem] Add one or more Reviewers.
• [EB Mem] Add label content: <content-type> for the type of contribution.
• [EB Mem] Add to Project Content Development (see Content Development).
• [EB Mem] Add meta-data to the *.md file(s) (set Publish: yes).
• [EB Mem] Add label preview (so PR branch will be merged to 'preview' branch and watch for possible merge failures).
• [EB Mem] Rebuild preview site and confirm new content is there, renders correctly and is returned in searches.
• [Author] Make any final changes to the PR based on feedback.
• [ ] [Author] Ensure wikize_refs.py -i <base>.md is run and commit (if using wikize_refs.py).
• [EB Mem] Rebuild preview site and re-confirm content looks correct.
• [EB Mem] Ensure at least one reviewer signs off on the final changes.
• [EB Mem] Move the PR to "Ready to Publish" in Content Development.
• [EB Mem] Leave comment and @mention @betterscientificsoftware/bssw-maint (BSSw Maint) asking to carry out final publication steps.
• [BSSw Maint] Verify that all needed files are present in the PR (article, images, updates to Site/Homepage.md carousel and/or Site/Announcements/Announcements.md as appropriate).
• [BSSw Maint] Merge PR. (Should automatically move to "Done" in Content Development.)
• [BSSw Maint] Verify new contribution shows up on bssw.io as expected.

NOTE:

• Checklist items prefixed with [Author] are expected to be performed by the author of the PR or can be performed by the author.
• Checklist items prefixed with [EB Mem] must be performed by a BSSw.io Editorial Board (EB) Member.
• Checklist items prefixed with [BSSw Maint] must be performed by someone in the @betterscientificsoftware/bssw-maint team (hint: type @, b, s, s, w, -, m to auto-complete to @betterscientificsoftware/bssw-maint).

[bartlettroscoe]

I read the article is it reads well. I think this is a good addition to BSSw.io. It would make a good featured blog article.

[markcmiller86]

@bartlettroscoe thanks for the positive feedback 🎉 . That said, I am sheepish about merging myself because prior to ECP end, I would defer to final decision from @rinkug or maybe @bernhold or @curfman. Should I be wearinig a new thinking cap now?

[bartlettroscoe]

That said, I am sheepish about merging myself because prior to ECP end, I would defer to final decision from @rinkug or maybe @bernhold or @curfman.

@markcmiller86, that is a good question. But until we define the updated process, we should not assume that a positive review by a BSSw.io editorial member is sufficient for merging an article. I think we should follow the checklist process above.

[markcmiller86]

@betterscientificsoftware/bssw-maint this is ready for publication

[rinkug]

@markcmiller86 : Thanks so much for this nice article. Minor edits - The deck text should probably change and maybe the intro could be smoother. Since there are two authors, the "I" can sound ambiguous? I can help with it pending David's feedback. @bernhold: This is an short article, kind of interview style. Can you take a look and let me know what needs to change.

[bernhold]

Hi @markcmiller86, I'm editing this for publication later this week. I've taken the liberty of restructuring it to be more in the format of an interview. All I really did was to intersperse your questions into appropriate places in Peter's answers. And I moved one of Peter's paragraphs from one section (question) to another where it made more sense. Can you please give this version a quick scan and confirm that I haven't messed things up (too much)? Thanks

[markcmiller86]

@bernhold LGTM. Thanks

[lindstro]

Looks great. I have only a couple of minor corrections.