Fix: No Incidents Message #1763
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new rendering functions within the Changes
Possibly Related PRs
Suggested Reviewers
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/index.jsx (2)
100-102: Yo, this condition's got some repetition, dawg! Let's clean it up!Extract the reduce operation into a variable to avoid code duplication and improve readability.
+const totalDownChecks = monitor?.groupedDownChecks?.reduce( + (count, checkGroup) => count + checkGroup.totalChecks, + 0 +) ?? 0; + -{hoveredIncidentsData !== null || - (monitor?.groupedDownChecks?.reduce((count, checkGroup) => count + checkGroup.totalChecks, 0) > 0) ? ( +{hoveredIncidentsData !== null || totalDownChecks > 0 ? (
124-126: The message is straight fire, but let's make it translatable!Consider using a translation system for the "No incidents" message to support internationalization.
-Great. No incidents, yet! +{t('incidents.none')}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/index.jsx(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/index.jsx (1)
100-128: This implementation is straight 🔥! Clean conditional rendering!The logic for handling both incident and no-incident scenarios is well-structured and matches the PR objectives perfectly. The conditional rendering provides a clear user experience.
![llamapreview[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1023541?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Auto Pull Request Review from LlamaPReview
1. Overview
1.1 PR Summary
- Business value and requirements alignment: The PR fixes an issue where no message was displayed when there were no incidents. It aligns with the business requirement of providing clear and concise information to users.
- Key components modified: The incident display logic in the UI.
- Impact assessment: The change will affect the user experience and visual representation of incidents.
- System dependencies and integration impacts: The change interacts with the incident data and the UI components responsible for displaying this data.
1.2 Architecture Changes
- System design modifications: None.
- Component interactions: The change interacts with the incident data and the UI components responsible for displaying this data.
- Integration points: None.
2. Detailed Technical Analysis
2.1 Code Logic Deep-Dive
Core Logic Changes
- Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/index.jsx - ChartBoxes
- Submitted PR Code:
{hoveredIncidentsData !== null ||
(monitor?.groupedDownChecks?.reduce((count, checkGroup) => count + checkGroup.totalChecks, 0) > 0) ? (
// Original layout for when incidents exist
<Box position="relative">
<Typography component="span">
{hoveredIncidentsData !== null
? hoveredIncidentsData.totalChecks
: monitor?.groupedDownChecks?.reduce((count, checkGroup) => count + checkGroup.totalChecks, 0)}
</Typography>
{hoveredIncidentsData !== null && hoveredIncidentsData.time !== null && (
<Typography
component="h5"
position="absolute"
top="100%"
fontSize={11}
color={theme.palette.primary.contrastTextTertiary}
>
{formatDateWithTz(hoveredIncidentsData._id, dateFormat, uiTimezone)}
</Typography>
)}
</Box>
) : (
// Centered layout for "No incidents" message
<Box m="auto" marginY="25%">
<Typography component="span">
Great. No incidents, yet!
</Typography>
</Box>
)}- Analysis:
- The PR introduces conditional rendering based on the presence of incidents, which is a good approach for simplifying the UI and improving readability.
- However, the current logic assumes that
hoveredIncidentsDatais always available. If it'snulland there are no incidents, the component will throw an error when trying to accesshoveredIncidentsData.totalChecks. - The edge case where
hoveredIncidentsDataisnulland there are no incidents is not handled gracefully. - The
formatDateWithTzfunction is called even whenhoveredIncidentsData.timeisnull, which could lead to unexpected behavior or errors. - The "No incidents" message is hardcoded, which violates the "no hardcoded values" rule mentioned in the PR checklist.
- LlamaPReview Suggested Improvements:
{((hoveredIncidentsData?.totalChecks) !== undefined) ||
(monitor?.groupedDownChecks?.reduce((count, checkGroup) => count + checkGroup.totalChecks, 0) > 0) ? (
// Original layout for when incidents exist
<Box position="relative">
<Typography component="span">
{(hoveredIncidentsData?.totalChecks) ?? monitor?.groupedDownChecks?.reduce((count, checkGroup) => count + checkGroup.totalChecks, 0)}
</Typography>
{hoveredIncidentsData?.time !== null && (
<Typography
component="h5"
position="absolute"
top="100%"
fontSize={11}
color={theme.palette.primary.contrastTextTertiary}
>
{formatDateWithTz(hoveredIncidentsData._id, dateFormat, uiTimezone)}
</Typography>
)}
</Box>
) : (
// Centered layout for "No incidents" message
<Box m="auto" marginY="25%">
<Typography component="span">
{t('noIncidentsMessage')} {/* Use translation for the message */}
</Typography>
</Box>
)}- Improvement rationale:
- Using optional chaining (
?.) prevents the component from throwing an error when trying to access a property that isnullorundefined. - The
undefinedcheck ensures that the component does not throw an error whenhoveredIncidentsDataisnulland there are no incidents. - Using translations for the "No incidents" message ensures that the message is consistent across the application and can be easily updated if needed.
- The
formatDateWithTzfunction is only called whenhoveredIncidentsData.timeis notnull, preventing unexpected behavior or errors.
- Using optional chaining (
3. Critical Findings
Potential Issues
-
🔴 Critical Issues
- Issue: The current logic assumes that
hoveredIncidentsDatais always available, which can lead to errors if it'snulland there are no incidents. - Impact: The component will throw an error, leading to unexpected behavior and a poor user experience.
- Recommendation: Use optional chaining (
?.) and anundefinedcheck to prevent these errors.
- Issue: The current logic assumes that
-
🟡 Warnings
- Warning: The "No incidents" message is hardcoded, which violates the "no hardcoded values" rule mentioned in the PR checklist.
- Potential risks: Inconsistencies in the UI and difficulty maintaining the application.
- Suggested improvements: Use translations for the "No incidents" message to ensure consistency and ease of updates.
4. Security Assessment
Security Considerations
- Authentication/Authorization impacts: None.
- Data handling concerns: None.
- Input validation: The change does not introduce any new input validation concerns.
- Security best practices: The change aligns with security best practices.
- Potential security risks: None identified.
- Mitigation strategies: None required.
- Security testing requirements: None identified.
5. Testing Strategy
Testing Recommendations
-
Test Coverage:
- Unit test analysis: The change should be covered by unit tests to ensure that the conditional rendering logic works as expected.
- Integration test requirements: Integration tests should validate that the change works correctly with the rest of the application.
- Edge cases coverage: Tests should cover the edge case where
hoveredIncidentsDataisnulland there are no incidents.
-
Test Recommendations:
- Suggested Test Cases:
it('should display the "No incidents" message when there are no incidents', () => {
// Arrange
const monitor = { groupedDownChecks: [] };
const hoveredIncidentsData = null;
const { getByText } = render(<ChartBoxes monitor={monitor} hoveredIncidentsData={hoveredIncidentsData} />);
// Act & Assert
expect(getByText('Great. No incidents, yet!')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
it('should not throw an error when hoveredIncidentsData is null and there are no incidents', () => {
// Arrange
const monitor = { groupedDownChecks: [] };
const hoveredIncidentsData = null;
// Act & Assert
expect(() => render(<ChartBoxes monitor={monitor} hoveredIncidentsData={hoveredIncidentsData} />)).not.toThrow();
});- Coverage improvements: Ensure that the tests cover all possible scenarios, including edge cases.
- Performance testing needs: None identified.
6. Documentation & Maintenance
Documentation & Maintenance Considerations
- Documentation updates needed: The documentation should be updated to reflect the changes in the incident display logic.
- Long-term maintenance considerations: The change introduces a new layout for the "No incidents" scenario. It's important to ensure that this layout is maintained and updated as needed.
- Technical debt and monitoring requirements: None identified.
7. Deployment & Operations
Deployment & Operations Considerations
- Deployment impact and strategy: The change should be deployed as part of a regular release cycle.
- Key operational considerations: None identified.
8. Summary & Recommendations
8.1 Key Action Items
- Critical changes required: Implement the suggested improvements to prevent errors and ensure consistency in the UI.
- Important improvements suggested: Use translations for the "No incidents" message to ensure consistency and ease of updates.
- Best practices to implement: None identified.
- Cross-cutting concerns to address: None identified.
8.2 Future Considerations
- Technical evolution path: The change aligns with the technical evolution path of the application.
- Business capability evolution: The change aligns with the business capability evolution of the application.
- System integration impacts: The change does not introduce any new system integration impacts.
💡 Help Shape LlamaPReview
How's this review format working for you? Vote in our Github Discussion Polls to help us improve your review experience!
|
Can you please our one of standard fonts / colors from the theme? The font size / color of 'Incidents' header is a good fit for that. |
Have made the changes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This PR is a bit too myopic in nature, it only works for this one component. What happens when another ChartBox needs an empty view? We have to search through the codebase to find this specific implementation and copy it in order to be consistent. This is not maintainable.
A more comprehensive and maintainable approach would be to implement an empty view for the ChartBox component. We would then have the same empty view for all components that use ChartBox.
Another note I am trying to remove all ternary and most inline conditional rendering from this project, so please avoid unless absolutely necessary, use early returns instead, it keeps the code much cleaner and readable.
Alright, I understood your vision. We can create an empty view that takes in some kind of text as what to appear when we have an empty chartbox. Am I going in the right direction? Additionally, for the ternary operation, yes I can remove the use of it altogether, I was not aware that you are thinking of removing them and hence thought that this can be used |
Yes, I think the approach you outlined is reasonable. ChartBox can take a String to display as an empty view, with a default value of "No data" or something like that.
Yes, I am trying to remove as much complexity as I can from the application. Please follow the principle of early return as much as possible rather than conditionally rendering things. In pseudo code: instead of If |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/EmptyView.jsx (2)
5-13: Yo, let's make this component more theme-consistent and responsive!The component looks solid, but we could improve it by:
- Using theme spacing for margins
- Using theme typography variants for consistent styling
Here's a more theme-consistent version:
-const EmptyView = ({ message = "No Data", size = "h2" }) => { +const EmptyView = ({ message = "No Data", size = "h2", spacing = 8 }) => { return ( - <Box m="auto" marginY="25%"> + <Box + m="auto" + marginY={(theme) => theme.spacing(spacing)} + textAlign="center" + > <Typography variant={size}> {message} </Typography> </Box> ); };
15-20: Yo, let's beef up these PropTypes!The PropTypes are good but could be more robust:
- Make message required since it's a core prop
- Add PropTypes for the spacing prop
EmptyView.propTypes = { - message: PropTypes.string, + message: PropTypes.string.isRequired, size: PropTypes.oneOf(['h1', 'h2', 'h3', 'h4', 'h5', 'h6', 'body1', 'body2']), + spacing: PropTypes.number };Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/index.jsx (2)
40-81: Yo, this function's got a lot on its plate!The renderUptime function could use some cleanup:
- Extract the hover timestamp display into a separate component
- Use theme typography variants instead of hard-coded font sizes
- fontSize={11} + variant="caption"Also, consider extracting the timestamp display:
const TimeStamp = ({ time, dateFormat, uiTimezone }) => ( <Typography component="h5" position="absolute" top="100%" variant="caption" color={(theme) => theme.palette.primary.contrastTextTertiary} > {formatDateWithTz(time, dateFormat, uiTimezone)} </Typography> );
165-175: Yo, let's make these PropTypes more specific!The PropTypes could be more detailed, especially for complex objects:
- monitor: PropTypes.object, + monitor: PropTypes.shape({ + upChecks: PropTypes.shape({ + totalChecks: PropTypes.number + }), + downChecks: PropTypes.shape({ + totalChecks: PropTypes.number + }), + avgResponseTime: PropTypes.number, + groupedUpChecks: PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.shape({ + totalChecks: PropTypes.number, + _id: PropTypes.string + })), + groupedDownChecks: PropTypes.arrayOf(PropTypes.shape({ + totalChecks: PropTypes.number, + _id: PropTypes.string + })) + }),
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/EmptyView.jsx(1 hunks)Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/index.jsx(5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/EmptyView.jsx (1)
1-4: Yo, these imports are clean and organized!The separation between component imports and utility imports is on point.
Client/src/Pages/Uptime/Details/Components/ChartBoxes/index.jsx (1)
110-115: Yo, this function's clean and lean!The renderResponseTime function is well-structured with a good early return pattern.
| const renderIncidents = () => { | ||
| const downChecks = monitor?.groupedDownChecks?.reduce((count, checkGroup) => count + checkGroup.totalChecks, 0); | ||
| if (!downChecks && !hoveredIncidentsData) { | ||
| return <EmptyView message="Great. No incidents, yet!" />; | ||
| } | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Box position="relative"> | ||
| <Typography component="span"> | ||
| {hoveredIncidentsData !== null | ||
| ? hoveredIncidentsData.totalChecks | ||
| : downChecks} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| {hoveredIncidentsData !== null && hoveredIncidentsData.time !== null && ( | ||
| <Typography | ||
| component="h5" | ||
| position="absolute" | ||
| top="100%" | ||
| fontSize={11} | ||
| color={theme.palette.primary.contrastTextTertiary} | ||
| > | ||
| {formatDateWithTz(hoveredIncidentsData._id, dateFormat, uiTimezone)} | ||
| </Typography> | ||
| )} | ||
| </Box> | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Yo, we're seeing some code déjà vu here!
The renderIncidents function duplicates logic from renderUptime:
- TimeStamp display logic is repeated
- Hard-coded font size appears again
Extract shared components and use theme values:
- fontSize={11}
+ variant="caption"Consider creating a shared utility for check counting:
const getTotalChecks = (checks) =>
checks?.reduce((count, checkGroup) =>
count + checkGroup.totalChecks, 0) ?? 0;
WhatsApp.Video.2025-02-15.at.16.51.00.mp4I have refactored Chartboxes and made early return statements. |
Br0wnHammer
force-pushed
the
fix/fe/incidents-text
branch
from
002d0cc to
a6bb756
Compare
Br0wnHammer
force-pushed
the
fix/fe/incidents-text
branch
from
a6bb756 to
2879126
Compare
|
Hey @ajhollid , I have made use of low level empty view component. Similarly for incidents: 
|
Describe your changes
This update modifies the incident display logic in the UI. It now conditionally renders the following:
[Have tested on Safari, Chrome & Firefox]
Issue number
#1757
Please ensure all items are checked off before requesting a review. "Checked off" means you need to add an "x" character between brackets so they turn into checkmarks.