-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
Fix requests with body #2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
klauspost
wants to merge
1
commit into
bobziuchkovski:master
Choose a base branch
from
klauspost:copy-body-for-post
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reading the body into RAM isn't great if the payload is large. If req2.GetBody is non-nil we should use it to set req2.Body.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
req2is a shallow copy ofreq, so they both refer to the same reader.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, and that's the issue being solved in this PR, with the drawback that the body is buffered in RAM. By calling http.Request.GetBody on the request we can get a fresh io.Reader for the second request and not have to copy the data.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, that is some new fancy tech from Go 1.8 :D
You could also check if the reader is seekable... but this PR is dead anyway. Just leaving it here for others, not using it any more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Wow what a coincidence that this was discussed/revived in the last 24 hours. I spent 30 minutes debugging this problem and then an hour or two of research to find that this library had the bug of not cloning the Body. Most of the other clients I have seen do read the body into memory to clone it and none of them have been using
GetBody. Any movement on this merge request? I've since switched to another library that is copying:https://github.com/gabstv/httpdigest/blob/master/transport.go#L105
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh dear, another digest package. I thought I'd found all of them yesterday. I'd say the chances of this PR getting merged are close to zero, but perhaps one of the other similar packages takes PRs. I've been using github.com/toaster/digest myself. I'll probably send a PR to it for adding support for http.Request.GetBody.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bobziuchkovski