Adding types v1 #357
Merged
Adding types v1 #357
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Nice! Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds types that guide user from
sql.defineto table objects, and type-helped use of those. Related issue is #351Definition file is very useful, yet isn't 100% incomplete, as only
sql.defineis added to types, while there are other things in the module. SQL is vast, so is node-sql (superb job 👍 ), hence, 100% coverage with types is a task. But I already use these types in production. Can we say that 80% is already here?Definitions can be a place for comments that people will read, thanks to mature TS's tooling (VSCode, etc.). So, definitions can be added. It can be done gradually.