COnfusing notation in the command summary

[bryanckh]

Since we can't omit both optional fields, it would be better to use a different notation for the updatetask command to avoid confusing the user when reading the command summary

[nus-se-script]

Team's Response

It is already stated in the Update Task section that at least one optional field must be provided.

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

• I disagree

Reason for disagreement: I agree with what the team is saying, but it would be better to include this statement in the command summary as well, so that users will not need to also refer to the command itself to realise this fact, saving some minor inconveniences for them. This is especially so since all the other commands (except the two update commands) do follow the rule that square brackets are optional in the command summary, so users could expect that the rule will also hold for this command.

---