feat: [WD-34728] Storage driver custom select#1916
Conversation
42f2e86 to
7634023
Compare
edlerd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good start, some ideas to refine the changes below.
omarelkashef
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for the PR. A few comments below
4d45bde to
db7458f
Compare
db7458f to
fabdf29
Compare
omarelkashef
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you for the iteration. It looks nearly perfect, but I think it broke some tests.
edlerd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mostly LGTM, tiny nitpicks below.
fabdf29 to
2051446
Compare
edlerd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
QA LGTM, some tiny nitpicks below, then good to merge 👍
12e12ce to
955dc7a
Compare
51c980a to
30e13bc
Compare
30e13bc to
3321293
Compare
edlerd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM, thanks for the iterations :)
|
I think this breaks some of the tests though, can you check the CI results for new errors related to the changes in here? |
3321293 to
80e9fd8
Compare
|
@edlerd I think tests should be looking good from now (storage wise) |
The 5.21 tests are still failing with storage bucket errors. I think that is due to changes in this PR. |
d587c44 to
7160125
Compare
ac7969f to
b1d39d9
Compare
edlerd
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
two ideas to simplify this further.
b1d39d9 to
7ad6c17
Compare
Signed-off-by: Nkeiruka <nkeiruka.whenu@canonical.com>
7ad6c17 to
289fa4d
Compare
Done
QA
Screenshots
Read only output field usage:

Help text specification for the storage drivers that require storage appliances:
