Proposal: On-Chain Enforcement of Super Validator Locking and Long-Term Commitment#269
Proposal: On-Chain Enforcement of Super Validator Locking and Long-Term Commitment#269cardenaso11 wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
A complete solution for Phase 2 needs to consider locking delegation and wallet substitution, to allow apps to be built that support a full lifecycle of lending and borrowing by SVs. A Phase 2 solution in Splice should cover all the steps in the current Phase 1 operational process. Please review the Phase 1 operational process at https://github.com/canton-foundation/configs/blob/main/Super%20Validator%20Operational%20Processes/SV-Locking-Process.md Please also consider partnering with Helix Labs and/or Cumberland and/or Avro Digital to provide a complete solution for Phase 2, or propose an Obsidian-only approach that addresses all these features. |
| - **PR \#184 (Concordia — allocation primitives):** [https://github.com/canton-foundation/canton-dev-fund/pull/184](https://github.com/canton-foundation/canton-dev-fund/pull/184) | ||
| - **PR \#47 (DA Splice Management Grant):** 1,000,000 CC/month recurring; structural reference for Maintenance Plan candidate paths | ||
| - **Helix Labs delegated locking attempt (excluded):** [https://github.com/hyperledger-labs/splice/issues/4842](https://github.com/hyperledger-labs/splice/issues/4842) | ||
| - **CIP-0104 (specification and design depth reference):** protocol changes, implementation funded under PR \#107 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There's also a prior draft of a locking mechanism: https://github.com/hyperledger-labs/splice/pull/3603
I'd suggest to also mention that; and take it into account in the design phase.
|
Hi @cardenaso11 There are at least 3 teams working on CIP 105 components already. I propose that we pause on this grant proposal draft until we can flesh out the CIP105 design further. Top of mind:
Happy to discuss! Relevant Resources |
|
What assumption / dependencies does this implementation have on smart contract support by wallet providers or custodians? Do wallet /exchange providers (i.e. DFNS, Copper, Blockdaemon, Bitgo, etc, etc) need to support any contracts, Dars, automation if they are currently used for holding the SV balances? |
|
Some useful comments from HelixLabs @vazilias https://github.com/vaziliaz on Eric Mann's (Avro Digital) proposal here: |
Development Fund Proposal Submission
Proposal file:
Link to the proposal added in this PR (e.g., /proposals/your-proposal-name.md)
/proposals/CIP-0105.md
Permalink: https://github.com/obsidiansystems/canton-dev-fund/blob/1f9706eb379d7327c7f5755763e3b85d78cf09f0/proposals/CIP-0105.md
Summary
Briefly describe the proposal and the value it delivers to the Canton ecosystem (2–3 sentences).
CIP-0105 (Super Validator Locking & Long-Term Commitment Framework) was approved by the Canton Foundation on March 2, 2026. Phase 2, the on-chain enforcement layer that delivers the framework's core value, remains unimplemented.
This proposal funds Obsidian Systems to design, build, deploy, and maintain Phase 2 as a Splice application.
Checklist
/proposals/Notes for Reviewers
(Add anything the Tech & Ops Committee should pay attention to.)
Tech & Ops Voting Committee Champion: Ali Abrar