Conversation
Added Vivgrid section with model limits and request details.
Summary of ChangesHello @Yoname, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request enhances the project's documentation by integrating Vivgrid into the list of free API access providers. The update includes essential information such as Vivgrid's request limits and the specific models it supports, making it easier for users to discover and utilize this new service. The primary goal is to keep the resource list comprehensive and up-to-date for the community. Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds Vivgrid as a new provider. However, it cannot be merged in its current form due to two critical issues. Firstly, it directly modifies README.md, which is an auto-generated file; changes must be made to the underlying generator script. Secondly, the provider Vivgrid appears to violate the repository's contribution guidelines by listing models that are not publicly available (e.g., GPT-5, Gemini 3.0), which suggests it may be an illegitimate service. There are also several formatting inconsistencies that should be addressed.
| - [GitHub Models](#github-models) | ||
| - [Cloudflare Workers AI](#cloudflare-workers-ai) | ||
| - [Google Cloud Vertex AI](#google-cloud-vertex-ai) | ||
| - [Vivgrid](#vivgrid) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This README.md file is auto-generated and should not be edited directly, as stated in the warning at the top of the file. All changes should be made by modifying the generator script (src/pull_available_models.py) or its data sources, and then running the script to update the README. Direct edits will be overwritten.
| ### [Vivgrid](https://vivgrid.com) | ||
|
|
||
| **Limits:** | ||
|
|
||
| [5 requests/minute<br>no requests limits/day](https://docs.vivgrid.com/models) | ||
|
|
||
| - gpt-5.2-instant | ||
| - gpt-5 | ||
| - gpt-5-mini | ||
| - gpt-4.1 | ||
| - gpt-4o | ||
| - Gemini-3.0 | ||
| - gemini-2.5-pro | ||
| - gemini-2.5-flash | ||
| - deepseek-v3.2-exp | ||
| - deepseek-v3.1 | ||
| - deepseek-r1-0528 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The provider being added, Vivgrid, appears to violate the repository's contribution guidelines regarding legitimacy. It lists several models like gpt-5, gpt-5.2-instant, gpt-4.1, and Gemini-3.0 which have not been publicly released by their respective developers (OpenAI and Google). This suggests the service might be based on reverse-engineering or other practices that are explicitly disallowed by this repository's policy. Please refer to the contribution guidelines in the PR template and the warning note in the README.
| [5 requests/minute<br>no requests limits/day](https://docs.vivgrid.com/models) | ||
|
|
||
| - gpt-5.2-instant | ||
| - gpt-5 | ||
| - gpt-5-mini | ||
| - gpt-4.1 | ||
| - gpt-4o | ||
| - Gemini-3.0 | ||
| - gemini-2.5-pro | ||
| - gemini-2.5-flash | ||
| - deepseek-v3.2-exp | ||
| - deepseek-v3.1 | ||
| - deepseek-r1-0528 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There are a few formatting and clarity issues in this section that should be addressed for consistency with the rest of the document:
- The limit description
no requests limits/dayis ambiguous. It should be rephrased for clarity, for example, asunlimited daily requests. - The model names are not consistently cased (e.g.,
Gemini-3.0vsgemini-2.5-pro). They should follow a consistent capitalization scheme. - Unlike other providers in this list, the models are not hyperlinked to a page with more details.
Added Vivgrid section with model limits and request details.