feat: add iOS SPM (Swift Package Manager) support #3
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
- Enhance install skill with SPM detection and installation guidance - Add SPM verification to doctor skill with installationMethod field - Update system prompt with iOS dependency manager detection priority - Add SPM documentation to llms.txt and README.md - Support both Package.swift and Xcode with SPM scenarios
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughExpanded iOS dependency-manager detection and installation documentation: adds prioritized SPM, CocoaPods, and Xcode project detection paths, introduces an installationMethod diagnostic field, and replaces prior generic instructions with multi-path, scenario-driven installation guidance. No functional code changes. Changes
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing touches
Comment |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 1fc7643240
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@src/lib/embedded-skills.ts`:
- Around line 1275-1281: Update the iOS dependency detection order in the source
that generates this section so Podfile (searching for 'ClixSDK' or 'Clix') is
checked before Xcode SPM checks; specifically ensure the rules that set
installationMethod values (e.g. installationMethod: "cocoapods", "spm-xcode",
"spm-package-swift") reflect the desired priority (Podfile → Xcode SPM →
Package.swift), make the same order consistent with the doctor/SKILL.md source,
then regenerate the embedded skills output by running the embed-skills
generation script to update this auto-generated block.
In `@src/lib/skills/doctor/SKILL.md`:
- Around line 45-51: The iOS dependency detection order in doctor/SKILL.md is
inconsistent with install/SKILL.md and system-prompt.ts; update the iOS checks
in doctor/SKILL.md so the priority matches the others: 1) `Package.swift` (SPM
package) → `installationMethod: "spm-package-swift"`, 2) `Podfile` for 'ClixSDK'
or 'Clix' → `installationMethod: "cocoapods"`, 3) `*.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj`
`XCRemoteSwiftPackageReference` containing `clix` → `installationMethod:
"spm-xcode"`, ensuring the same step order and exact `installationMethod` values
as used in install/SKILL.md and system-prompt.ts.
- Require iOS platform target in Package.swift (.iOS or platforms: [.iOS) to distinguish from server-side Swift packages - Unify detection order across doctor and install skills: 1. Package.swift with iOS platform 2. Podfile (CocoaPods) 3. Xcode project with SPM references - Regenerate embedded-skills.ts with updated prompts Addresses PR review feedback about false iOS detection for non-iOS Swift packages (server, CLI, shared libraries).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@src/lib/embedded-skills.ts`:
- Around line 1128-1159: The iOS installation steps in the generated "iOS
(Dependency Manager Detection)" section are out of order vs the detection
priority; swap the CocoaPods block (the "CocoaPods Project (has `Podfile`)"
section) to be step 2 and the Xcode SPM block (the "Xcode Project with SPM (has
`project.pbxproj` with `XCRemoteSwiftPackageReference`)") to be step 3 so the
sequence becomes Package.swift → Podfile → Xcode SPM → Bare Xcode; fix this in
the canonical source (e.g., install/SKILL.md or the template that generates
src/lib/embedded-skills.ts) and regenerate the embedded-skills.ts output so the
generated `iOS (Dependency Manager Detection)` section matches the detection
priority.
In `@src/lib/skills/install/SKILL.md`:
- Line 23: The markdown line has an unclosed code span and bracket for the
platform criteria; update the text so the code reference is consistent (wrap
`platforms: [.iOS]` in backticks and close the bracket) so the entry reads
something like `Package.swift` with iOS platform target (contains `.iOS` or
`platforms: [.iOS]`) → **Pure SPM iOS project**; ensure `.iOS` and `platforms:
[.iOS]` are each enclosed in backticks like the other code references.
- Around line 22-27: Update the SPM platform detection documentation in SKILL.md
to include the missing valid SwiftPM syntaxes and/or clarify LLM flexibility:
add examples such as platforms: [.iOS(.v13)], platforms: [.iOS("13.0")], and
platforms: [.iOS(.v13), .macOS(.v10_15)] to the iOS detection bullet, and append
a short note that the LLM may recognize other equivalent SwiftPM platform
declarations beyond the listed patterns (i.e., the list is illustrative, not
exhaustive); reference the iOS detection list in the "iOS (in order of
priority)" section so readers know where to find these examples.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/lib/skills/install/SKILL.md (1)
63-68: Consider path flexibility for CocoaPods installation command.The command
cd ios && pod installassumes the Podfile is in anios/subdirectory, which is standard for React Native projects but not for pure iOS projects where the Podfile is typically in the project root.Since this documentation covers multiple project types (as indicated by the detection priority), consider making this guidance more flexible or adding a note about path variations.
💡 Suggested improvement
3. **CocoaPods Project** (has `Podfile`): - Add to Podfile: ```ruby pod 'Clix', :git => 'https://github.com/clix-so/clix-ios-sdk.git' ``` - - Run: `cd ios && pod install` + - Run: `pod install` (or `cd ios && pod install` for React Native projects)
Comment on lines
+1128
to
+1159
| **iOS (Dependency Manager Detection):** | ||
| First, detect the dependency manager being used: | ||
| 1. **Pure SPM iOS Project** (has \`Package.swift\` with iOS platform target): | ||
| - First verify Package.swift contains iOS platform (\`.iOS\` or \`platforms: [.iOS\`) | ||
| - If no iOS platform found, this is likely a server-side Swift project - skip iOS installation | ||
| - Read Package.swift and add to dependencies array: | ||
| \`\`\`swift | ||
| .package(url: "https://github.com/clix-so/clix-ios-sdk.git", from: "1.0.0") | ||
| \`\`\` | ||
| - Add to target dependencies: | ||
| \`\`\`swift | ||
| .product(name: "Clix", package: "clix-ios-sdk") | ||
| \`\`\` | ||
| - Run \`swift package resolve\` | ||
| 2. **Xcode Project with SPM** (has \`project.pbxproj\` with \`XCRemoteSwiftPackageReference\`): | ||
| - Inform user to add via Xcode: File > Add Package Dependencies | ||
| - URL: \`https://github.com/clix-so/clix-ios-sdk\` | ||
| - Note: Direct .pbxproj modification is complex; prefer Xcode UI | ||
| 3. **CocoaPods Project** (has \`Podfile\`): | ||
| - Add to Podfile: | ||
| \`\`\`ruby | ||
| pod 'Clix', :git => 'https://github.com/clix-so/clix-ios-sdk.git' | ||
| \`\`\` | ||
| - Run: \`cd ios && pod install\` | ||
| 4. **Bare Xcode Project** (only \`*.xcodeproj\` or \`*.xcworkspace\`): | ||
| - Recommend SPM: Guide user to add via Xcode (File > Add Package Dependencies) | ||
| - Alternative: Create Podfile and use CocoaPods |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Installation step order doesn't match detection priority.
The detection priority (Lines 1109-1113) specifies: Package.swift → Podfile → Xcode SPM → Bare Xcode.
However, the installation steps here use: Package.swift → Xcode SPM → CocoaPods → Bare Xcode.
Swap steps 2 and 3 so CocoaPods is checked before Xcode SPM, matching the detection priority. Since this file is auto-generated, fix the source file (install/SKILL.md or equivalent) and regenerate.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@src/lib/embedded-skills.ts` around lines 1128 - 1159, The iOS installation
steps in the generated "iOS (Dependency Manager Detection)" section are out of
order vs the detection priority; swap the CocoaPods block (the "CocoaPods
Project (has `Podfile`)" section) to be step 2 and the Xcode SPM block (the
"Xcode Project with SPM (has `project.pbxproj` with
`XCRemoteSwiftPackageReference`)") to be step 3 so the sequence becomes
Package.swift → Podfile → Xcode SPM → Bare Xcode; fix this in the canonical
source (e.g., install/SKILL.md or the template that generates
src/lib/embedded-skills.ts) and regenerate the embedded-skills.ts output so the
generated `iOS (Dependency Manager Detection)` section matches the detection
priority.
Comment on lines
+22
to
+27
| - **iOS (in order of priority):** | ||
| 1. `Package.swift` with iOS platform target (contains `.iOS` or `platforms: [.iOS`) → **Pure SPM iOS project** | ||
| 2. `Podfile` exists → **CocoaPods project** | ||
| 3. `*.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj` containing `XCRemoteSwiftPackageReference` → **Xcode with SPM** | ||
| 4. `*.xcodeproj` or `*.xcworkspace` only → **Suggest SPM** (modern, recommended) | ||
| - Note: `Package.swift` without iOS platform is likely a server-side Swift or CLI project, not iOS |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Package.swift platform detection implementation
# Look for detection logic in TypeScript/JavaScript files
rg -n 'Package\.swift|platforms.*iOS|\.iOS' --type=ts --type=js -g '!node_modules' -g '!dist' -A 3 -B 3
# Also search for files that might contain the skill implementation
echo "=== Searching for skill implementation files ==="
find . -name "*install*" -type f \( -name "*.ts" -o -name "*.js" \) -not -path "*/node_modules/*" -not -path "*/dist/*" | head -20Repository: clix-so/clix-cli
Length of output: 4759
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Package.swift detection logic in install service
echo "=== Examining mcp-install-service.ts ==="
cat -n src/lib/services/mcp-install-service.ts | head -200
echo ""
echo "=== Looking for Package.swift file reading/parsing ==="
rg -n 'Package\.swift' --type=ts --type=js -A 5 -B 5
echo ""
echo "=== Searching for iOS platform detection patterns ==="
rg -n '\.iOS|platforms.*iOS' --type=ts --type=js -A 3 -B 3 | head -100Repository: clix-so/clix-cli
Length of output: 15200
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for actual file reading and pattern detection for Package.swift
echo "=== Searching for Package.swift file reading ==="
rg -n 'readFile|readFileSync' --type=ts --type=js -A 3 -B 1 | grep -A 3 -B 1 'Package'
echo ""
echo "=== Looking for regex or pattern matching for iOS detection ==="
rg -n 'regex|match|test.*iOS|\.iOS' --type=ts --type=js | grep -v node_modules | head -30
echo ""
echo "=== Checking for AI/LLM-based detection (system prompts) ==="
wc -l src/lib/constants/system-prompt.ts src/lib/embedded-skills.ts
echo ""
echo "=== Searching for where the skill execution happens ==="
rg -n 'Package\.swift' --type=ts --type=js -lRepository: clix-so/clix-cli
Length of output: 3434
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Look deeper into embedded-skills.ts to understand detection implementation
echo "=== Reading detection logic sections from embedded-skills.ts ==="
sed -n '1100,1200p' src/lib/embedded-skills.ts
echo ""
echo "=== Search for any specific pattern or regex definitions ==="
rg -n 'platforms.*iOS|\.iOS.*version|iOS.*v[0-9]' --type=ts --type=js
echo ""
echo "=== Check if this is a skill for AI/LLM ==="
head -100 src/lib/embedded-skills.ts | tail -50Repository: clix-so/clix-cli
Length of output: 6746
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Determine how embedded-skills.ts is used
echo "=== Search for where embedded-skills.ts is imported/used ==="
rg -n 'embedded-skills' --type=ts --type=js -g '!node_modules' -B 2 -A 2
echo ""
echo "=== Check if there's actual file parsing logic elsewhere ==="
rg -n 'Package.swift' --type=ts --type=js -l
echo ""
echo "=== Look at how skills are loaded/executed ==="
grep -r "SKILL.md\|embedded-skills\|Platform Detection" --include="*.ts" --include="*.js" | head -20Repository: clix-so/clix-cli
Length of output: 4935
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
# Verify if the variations mentioned in the review are valid SPM syntax patterns
echo "=== Search for any existing Package.swift examples in the repo ==="
find . -name "Package.swift" -type f -not -path "*/node_modules/*" | head -10
echo ""
echo "=== Check if there are any tests or examples showing SPM syntax ==="
rg -n 'Package.swift|platforms.*iOS|\.iOS' --type=swift -A 3 -B 3 2>/dev/null || echo "No Swift files found in search"
echo ""
echo "=== Examine the full SKILL.md file to see all documentation ==="
cat src/lib/skills/install/SKILL.mdRepository: clix-so/clix-cli
Length of output: 5322
Documentation patterns for SPM platform detection are incomplete.
The documented patterns (.iOS or platforms: [.iOS) cover basic cases but omit valid SPM syntax variations that real projects use:
platforms: [.iOS(.v13)]— version specification with.vNsyntaxplatforms: [.iOS("13.0")]— string-based version syntaxplatforms: [.iOS(.v13), .macOS(.v10_15)]— multiple platforms
Since this is LLM-guided detection (not regex-based), the actual capability may handle these variations, but the documentation should either enumerate all supported patterns or clarify that the LLM may recognize syntax beyond what's explicitly listed to avoid ambiguity.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@src/lib/skills/install/SKILL.md` around lines 22 - 27, Update the SPM
platform detection documentation in SKILL.md to include the missing valid
SwiftPM syntaxes and/or clarify LLM flexibility: add examples such as platforms:
[.iOS(.v13)], platforms: [.iOS("13.0")], and platforms: [.iOS(.v13),
.macOS(.v10_15)] to the iOS detection bullet, and append a short note that the
LLM may recognize other equivalent SwiftPM platform declarations beyond the
listed patterns (i.e., the list is illustrative, not exhaustive); reference the
iOS detection list in the "iOS (in order of priority)" section so readers know
where to find these examples.
| 2. Then check native platforms: | ||
| - `*.xcodeproj` or `*.xcworkspace` for iOS | ||
| - **iOS (in order of priority):** | ||
| 1. `Package.swift` with iOS platform target (contains `.iOS` or `platforms: [.iOS`) → **Pure SPM iOS project** |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix formatting inconsistency in platform detection criteria.
The backtick and bracket are not closed properly for platforms: [.iOS. This should be wrapped consistently like other code references.
📝 Proposed fix
- 1. `Package.swift` with iOS platform target (contains `.iOS` or `platforms: [.iOS`) → **Pure SPM iOS project**
+ 1. `Package.swift` with iOS platform target (contains `.iOS` or `platforms: [.iOS]`) → **Pure SPM iOS project**📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| 1. `Package.swift` with iOS platform target (contains `.iOS` or `platforms: [.iOS`) → **Pure SPM iOS project** | |
| 1. `Package.swift` with iOS platform target (contains `.iOS` or `platforms: [.iOS]`) → **Pure SPM iOS project** |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@src/lib/skills/install/SKILL.md` at line 23, The markdown line has an
unclosed code span and bracket for the platform criteria; update the text so the
code reference is consistent (wrap `platforms: [.iOS]` in backticks and close
the bracket) so the entry reads something like `Package.swift` with iOS platform
target (contains `.iOS` or `platforms: [.iOS]`) → **Pure SPM iOS project**;
ensure `.iOS` and `platforms: [.iOS]` are each enclosed in backticks like the
other code references.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Add comprehensive Swift Package Manager (SPM) support for iOS projects. The CLI now automatically detects and supports both SPM (recommended) and CocoaPods, providing appropriate installation guidance for each dependency manager.
Details
installationMethodfield in JSON outputRelated Issues
Related to CLIX-90: Improve Clix CLI support for iOS projects using SPM
How to Validate
bun run build- confirms build succeeds with new promptsbun test- all 529 tests pass including SPM-aware functionalityclix doctorin an SPM project - verifiesinstallationMethod: "spm-package-swift"outputclix installin CocoaPods project - confirms CocoaPods path still worksPre-Merge Checklist
Code Quality
bun run build)bun run typecheck)bun run lint)bun test) - 529 pass, 0 failDocumentation
Commit Standards
Platform Validation
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
New Features
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.