Skip to content

Conversation

rmloveland
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes DOC-8591

Specifically, we state that the cost of writes is ~O(1) in the number of inserts, which is misleading. The reality is that despite the parallelism introduced by pipelining, there is other work that happens for each write that does not come "for free".

@rmloveland rmloveland marked this pull request as draft September 9, 2025 20:09
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Deploy Preview for cockroachdb-api-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 71646e2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/cockroachdb-api-docs/deploys/68e563e7c0ba210008725a6a

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Deploy Preview for cockroachdb-interactivetutorials-docs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 71646e2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/cockroachdb-interactivetutorials-docs/deploys/68e563e760882d00082af81f

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Netlify Preview

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 71646e2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/cockroachdb-docs/deploys/68e563e76f21f20008f69182
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-20314--cockroachdb-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Fixes DOC-8591

Previously, we stated that the cost of writes is ~`O(1)` in the number
of inserts, which is wrong.

The reality is that despite the parallelism introduced by pipelining,
there is other work that happens for each SQL statement write that does
not come "for free".
@rmloveland rmloveland force-pushed the 20250909-DOC-8591-clarify-transaction-pipelining-docs branch from ce0234e to 7ebf84b Compare October 7, 2025 18:38
@rmloveland rmloveland marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2025 18:39
@rmloveland rmloveland requested a review from stevendanna October 7, 2025 18:46
@rmloveland
Copy link
Contributor Author

@stevendanna as the reviewer of #19601 (buffered writes) are you also a good reviewer for this update to the transaction pipelining docs? specifically we're correcting some misleading statements about performance that led to a customer filing a support issue (see DOC-8591 for details)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant