Skip to content

Conversation

@ryan-gang
Copy link
Contributor

@ryan-gang ryan-gang commented Jul 21, 2025

  • Removed the min parameter from makeFilter and hardcoded the threshold to 54.
  • Updated the printed output and applied range to reflect the new threshold.
  • Simplified the filter function and aligned the output with the expected results.

Accompanies: codecrafters-io/interpreter-tester#92

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Updated filtering logic to use a fixed threshold value.
    • Simplified usage by removing parameterization and redundant filtering steps.
    • Adjusted output to reflect the new fixed threshold.

Remove the min parameter from makeFilter and hardcode the threshold to 54.
Update the printed output and applied range to reflect the new threshold.
This simplifies the filter function and aligns the output with the expected results.
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 21, 2025

Walkthrough

The function makeFilter was refactored to no longer accept a parameter and instead uses a hardcoded threshold of 54. Associated calls and output logic were updated to match this fixed value, and the second filter usage was removed from the code.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
stage_descriptions/functions-06-ey3.md Refactored makeFilter to remove its parameter and use a fixed value. Updated calls and outputs to match. Removed second filter and related output.

Estimated code review effort

1 (~2 minutes)

Poem

A filter once flexible, now set in its way,
No more thresholds that change by the day.
Fifty-four is the line,
For numbers to shine,
Simpler code, less to say—
A bunny approves this tidy array! 🐇✨


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ryan-gang ryan-gang self-assigned this Jul 21, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
stage_descriptions/functions-06-ey3.md (3)

123-131: Extract the magic number into a named constant

The threshold 54 now shows up in three different spots (the if test, the log string, and the loop bound). Encapsulating it in a single MIN (or similarly-named) constant keeps the sample self-consistent and makes future edits trivial.

 fun makeFilter() {
-  fun filter(n) {
-    if (n < 54) {
+  var MIN = 54;
+  fun filter(n) {
+    if (n < MIN) {
       return false;
     }
     return true;
   }
   return filter;
 }

144-147: Rename helper to reflect the fixed threshold

greaterThanX implies a variable lower bound that no longer exists. Renaming improves clarity and avoids misleading future readers.

-var greaterThanX = makeFilter();
+var greaterThan54 = makeFilter();

-print "Numbers >= 54:";
-applyToNumbers(greaterThanX, 54 + 6);
+print "Numbers >= 54:";
+applyToNumbers(greaterThan54, 54 + 6);

152-160: Add a language hint to the fenced output block (MD040)

Markdown-lint flags this block because it lacks a language spec.
Using text (or output) silences the warning without affecting rendering.

-```
+```text
 Numbers >= 54:
 54
 55
 56
 57
 58
 59

</blockquote></details>

</blockquote></details>

<details>
<summary>📜 Review details</summary>

**Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI**
**Review profile: CHILL**
**Plan: Pro**


<details>
<summary>📥 Commits</summary>

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6a35b33d7d5a674654876da99c29fc40228f92ac and 9f2b9d729f4c81c9a616e4b47246ecc1d2c4426a.

</details>

<details>
<summary>📒 Files selected for processing (1)</summary>

* `stage_descriptions/functions-06-ey3.md` (2 hunks)

</details>

<details>
<summary>🧰 Additional context used</summary>

<details>
<summary>🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.17.2)</summary>

<details>
<summary>stage_descriptions/functions-06-ey3.md</summary>

152-152: Fenced code blocks should have a language specified

(MD040, fenced-code-language)

</details>

</details>

</details>

<details>
<summary>⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (9)</summary>

* GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (zig)
* GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (ocaml)
* GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (typescript)
* GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (swift)
* GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (kotlin)
* GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (java)
* GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (go)
* GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (c)
* GitHub Check: test_course_definition / test (cpp)

</details>

</details>

<!-- This is an auto-generated comment by CodeRabbit for review status -->

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants