Skip to content

Conversation

arvi18
Copy link

@arvi18 arvi18 commented Aug 14, 2025

Summary

Related Linear tickets, Github issues, and Community forum posts

Review / Merge checklist

  • PR title and summary are descriptive. (conventions)
  • Docs updated or follow-up ticket created.
  • Tests included.
  • PR Labeled with release/backport (if the PR is an urgent fix that needs to be backported)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated code formatting configuration file.
  • Known Issues
    • The formatting configuration now contains invalid content that can cause formatting/build tools to fail.
    • No changes to product functionality or user-facing features.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 14, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@arvi18 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 14 minutes and 57 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dcf7a61 and 4ef157d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .prettierrc.js (1 hunks)

Walkthrough

A stray comment and invalid code snippet were inserted into .prettierrc.js after the arrowParens option, leaving existing Prettier options unchanged but introducing a syntax error within the module.exports object.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Prettier config
./.prettierrc.js
Inserted a TODO comment and invalid code snippet inside module.exports after arrowParens; no existing options modified; file structure potentially broken by syntax error.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Poem

I nibbled the config, whoops—too bold!
A loop hopped in where keys should hold.
Prettier frowned, “This syntax? Nah.”
I’ll prune the weeds with tidy paw.
One clean chew—now formats flow,
Thump-thump! The carrots neatly row. 🥕🐇

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch Add-feature-This-logic-error-bug-occurs-when-the-developer-incorrect

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @arvi18, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

The pull request, titled "Update .prettierrc.js", introduces an unexpected modification to the Prettier configuration file. It adds a TODO comment along with a seemingly unrelated Java-like code snippet directly into the JavaScript configuration. This change appears to be unintentional or a placeholder that was committed by mistake, as it does not align with typical Prettier configuration updates.

Highlights

  • Prettier Configuration Anomaly: The .prettierrc.js file has been modified to include a TODO comment and a block of code resembling Java syntax. This inclusion is highly unusual for a JavaScript Prettier configuration and suggests an accidental commit.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

refacto-test bot commented Aug 14, 2025

Update .prettierrc.js

TL;DR: Added invalid Java code snippet as a TODO comment in the Prettier configuration file.


Refacto PR Summary

Modification to the Prettier configuration file with problematic code insertion.
This PR introduces a malformed Java code snippet inside the .prettierrc.js configuration file, marked with a TODO comment. The inserted code appears to be a while loop implementation that doesn't follow JavaScript syntax and is inappropriately placed within the configuration file. This is likely an accidental commit or testing code that should be removed as it would break the Prettier configuration.

Change Highlights

Click to expand
  • .prettierrc.js: Added malformed Java code snippet with TODO comment between configuration options
  • .prettierrc.js: Introduced extra blank lines around the invalid code
  • .prettierrc.js: Potential syntax error that would break Prettier configuration

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Dev as Developer
    participant Config as .prettierrc.js
    participant Prettier as Prettier
    
    Dev->>Config: Add invalid Java code
    Config->>Prettier: Configuration loaded
    Prettier-->>Dev: Configuration error
    Dev->>Config: Must remove invalid code
    Config->>Prettier: Valid configuration
    Prettier-->>Dev: Formatting works properly
Loading

Testing Guide

Click to expand
  1. Attempt to run Prettier with current configuration and verify it fails due to syntax error
  2. Remove the invalid Java code snippet (lines 33-36) from .prettierrc.js
  3. Verify Prettier works correctly after removing the invalid code
  4. Check that all existing formatting rules (arrowParens, etc.) still function as expected

@arvi18
Copy link
Author

arvi18 commented Aug 14, 2025

/refacto-test

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces invalid JavaScript code into the .prettierrc.js configuration file. This change will cause a syntax error when the file is parsed, which will break the Prettier code formatter across the entire project. The added code appears to have been committed by mistake and should be removed.

Copy link

refacto-test bot commented Aug 14, 2025

Refacto is reviewing this PR. Please wait for the review comments to be posted.

Copy link

refacto-test bot commented Aug 14, 2025

Review: Prettierrc Configuration Issue

📌 Files Processed
  • .prettierrc.js
📝 Additional Comments
.prettierrc.js (3)
Incorrect Loop Condition

The loop condition (currentValue == targetValue) is initially false (0 == 10), so the loop will never execute. This appears to be a logical error in the code fragment that doesn't belong in this file.

Standards:

  • Algorithm Correctness
  • Logical Flow Validation
TODO Comment

There's a TODO comment preceding the Java code fragment. This indicates incomplete work or uncertainty about the implementation, which is inappropriate for a configuration file.

Standards:

  • Clean Code - Comment Quality
  • Configuration Management
Excessive Whitespace

Multiple empty lines have been added around the Java code fragment. This creates unnecessary whitespace in the configuration file, reducing readability and maintainability.

Standards:

  • Clean Code - Formatting
  • Code Style Guidelines

Co-authored-by: refacto-test[bot] <217047508+refacto-test[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

💡 Knowledge Base configuration:

  • MCP integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Jira integration is disabled by default for public repositories
  • Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these settings in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f150343 and dcf7a61.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .prettierrc.js (1 hunks)

@visz11
Copy link

visz11 commented Oct 8, 2025

/refacto-visz

Copy link

refacto-visz bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Refacto is reviewing this PR. Please wait for the review comments to be posted.

Copy link

refacto-visz bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Configuration File Review

📁 Selected files for review (1)
  • .prettierrc.js
🎯 Custom Instructions
✅ Applied Instructions
Organization Guidelines
  • Reuse code wherever possible and avoid redundant code by refactoring with utils and static method across application

Scope: All files

❌ Unapplied Instructions
portal-backend

Reason: Repository 'portal-backend' does not match current PR repository

refacto-api

Reason: Repository 'refacto-api' does not match current PR repository

pr-reviewer

Reason: Repository 'pr-reviewer' does not match current PR repository

mypy

Reason: Repository 'mypy' does not match current PR repository

bazel

Reason: Repository 'bazel' does not match current PR repository

devd-client

Reason: Repository 'devd-client' does not match current PR repository

📝 Additional Comments
.prettierrc.js (1)
Incomplete TODO Implementation

TODO comment lacks context about what implementation needs review and provides no actionable guidance. This creates technical debt and unclear maintenance requirements.

Standards:

  • Technical Debt Management
  • Code Documentation

Comment on lines +32 to +36


// TODO: Review this implementation


Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove Empty Lines

Multiple empty lines and incomplete TODO comment add unnecessary whitespace without providing value. This creates visual clutter in configuration file and suggests unfinished work.

Standards
  • Clean Code
  • Configuration Management

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants