Lock file maintenance (main) - autoclosed

[red-hat-konflux]

This PR contains the following updates:

Update	Change
lockFileMaintenance	All locks refreshed

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the warning logs for more information.

🔧 This Pull Request updates lock files to use the latest dependency versions.

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - Between 12:00 AM and 04:59 AM ( * 0-4 * * * ) (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

👻 Immortal: This PR will be recreated if closed unmerged. Get config help if that's undesired.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

To execute skipped test pipelines write comment /ok-to-test.

---

Documentation

Find out how to configure dependency updates in MintMaker documentation or see all available configuration options in Renovate documentation.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Flag	Coverage Δ
acceptance	53.43% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
generative	16.79% <ø> (ø)
integration	27.66% <ø> (ø)
unit	69.13% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[fullsend-ai-review]

🤖 Finished Review · ✅ Success · Started 3:17 AM UTC · Completed 3:26 AM UTC
Commit: 47d3320 · View workflow run →

[fullsend-ai-review]

Review

Findings

Medium

• [supply chain / dependency integrity] package-lock.json:302 — The lodash version is being bumped from 4.17.21 to 4.18.1. As of the reviewer's training data cutoff, 4.17.21 was the latest lodash 4.x release. However, given that the current date is June 2026 (well past the training cutoff), a legitimate 4.18.1 release is plausible. The resolved URL points to the canonical registry.npmjs.org. The version should be verified against the live npm registry before merging, but this is a routine verification step, not evidence of a supply chain attack.
  Remediation: Before merging, verify that lodash 4.18.1 exists on https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash. This is a standard due-diligence check for any dependency bump, not an emergency response.

Low

• [supply chain / dependency integrity] package-lock.json:195 — The other dependency bumps (fastq 1.19.1→1.20.1, picomatch 2.3.1→2.3.2, yaml 1.10.2→1.10.3) should be verified against the npm registry as standard practice for any lock file update. All resolved URLs point to registry.npmjs.org.
  Remediation: Spot-check that each updated version exists on the official npm registry before merging.

[fullsend-ai-review]

See the review comment for full details.

[fullsend-ai-review]

[medium] supply chain / dependency integrity

The lodash version is being bumped from 4.17.21 to 4.18.1. As of the reviewer's training data cutoff, 4.17.21 was the latest lodash 4.x release. However, given that the current date is June 2026 (well past the training cutoff), a legitimate 4.18.1 release is plausible. The resolved URL points to the canonical registry.npmjs.org. The version should be verified against the live npm registry before merging, but this is a routine verification step, not evidence of a supply chain attack.

Suggested fix: Before merging, verify that lodash 4.18.1 exists on https://www.npmjs.com/package/lodash. This is a standard due-diligence check for any dependency bump, not an emergency response.

[fullsend-ai-review]

[low] supply chain / dependency integrity

The other dependency bumps (fastq 1.19.1 to 1.20.1, picomatch 2.3.1 to 2.3.2, yaml 1.10.2 to 1.10.3) should be verified against the npm registry as standard practice for any lock file update. All resolved URLs point to registry.npmjs.org.

Suggested fix: Spot-check that each updated version exists on the official npm registry before merging.

[fullsend-ai-retro]

🤖 Finished Retro · ✅ Success · Started 10:23 PM UTC · Completed 10:30 PM UTC
Commit: 47d3320 · View workflow run →

[fullsend-ai-retro]

Retro: PR #3174 (conforma/cli) — Lock file maintenance (autoclosed bot PR)

Timeline

1. 2026-03-14 — red-hat-konflux[bot] opened PR #3174, a lockfile maintenance PR bumping fastq, lodash, picomatch, and yaml in package-lock.json. CI passed (except the enterprise contract check which failed, blocking auto-merge).
2. 2026-06-20 03:15–03:26 UTC — The review agent ran (~10 min), posting 2 inline comments: a medium-severity supply chain flag on the lodash 4.17.21→4.18.1 bump, and a low-severity flag on 3 other bumps. It applied requires-manual-review.
3. 2026-06-25 — The PR was autoclosed without merging after ~3 months with zero human engagement.
4. 2026-06-25 22:23 UTC — Retro agent dispatched on the autoclosed PR.

Assessment

This workflow exhibited several known inefficiency patterns, all of which are already tracked in fullsend-ai/fullsend:

• Retro on autoclosed bot PR — Covered by #2461 (Skip retro dispatch for autoclosed bot-authored PRs). This retro run is itself an example of the wasted tokens that issue describes.
• Full review pipeline for lockfile-only bot PR — Covered by #1358 (Add lightweight review path for trivial bot dependency bumps). The review agent spent ~8 minutes and produced findings no human ever read.
• Supply chain findings without automated verification — Covered by #370 (Review agent should verify dependency updates target latest versions). The review agent flagged the lodash bump for manual npm registry verification but did not perform the verification itself.
• Review verdict on bot PRs — Covered by #2057 (Use COMMENT verdict for bot-authored PRs with only informational findings) and #2588 (Downgrade protected-path severity for bot-authored dependency update PRs).

Conclusion

No new proposals are warranted — existing open issues comprehensively cover the improvement opportunities identified. The most impactful issue to prioritize for this class of PR would be #2461 (skip retro for autoclosed bot PRs), which would have prevented this retro run entirely, followed by #1358 (lightweight review for trivial bot dependency bumps), which would have reduced the review cost.