Fix concurrent role creation with exception handling only (no advisory locks) #326
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix concurrent role creation with exception handling only (no advisory locks)
Summary
This PR addresses the intermittent CI error
ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint "pg_authid_rolname_index"by catching bothduplicate_objectANDunique_violationexceptions in all role creation code paths.Key difference from PR #325: This PR does NOT use advisory locks - it relies solely on exception handling to deal with concurrent role creation attempts.
Root Cause: Under concurrent execution,
CREATE ROLEcan hit thepg_authid_rolname_indexunique constraint before PostgreSQL's duplicate object detection runs, resulting inunique_violation(error code 23505) instead ofduplicate_object(error code 42710).This Solution: Updated exception handlers to catch both error codes across all 4 role creation code paths:
bootstrap-roles.sql(anonymous, authenticated, administrator)bootstrap-test-roles.sql(app_user, app_admin)LaunchQLInit.bootstrapDbRoles()(custom users)DbAdmin.createUserRole()(pgsql-test users)Review & Testing Checklist for Human
lql admin-users add --test --yesin 5+ parallel shells) to verify this approach handles the race conditionunique_violationhere doesn't accidentally mask other unrelated unique constraint violationsRecommended Test Plan
Notes
Link to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/2c33cab4511f4a7897e29001895487df
Requested by: Dan Lynch (@pyramation)