feat(cli): add Linux (.deb/.rpm) and Windows (Chocolatey) c2patool package builds#2040
feat(cli): add Linux (.deb/.rpm) and Windows (Chocolatey) c2patool package builds#2040gpeacock wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Add cargo-deb and cargo-generate-rpm metadata to cli/Cargo.toml and CI steps to build and upload .deb, .rpm, and .nupkg artifacts to GitHub releases. Add chocolatey/ package template. Update README installation section with Homebrew (macOS/Linux), Chocolatey, .deb, and .rpm instructions.
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2040 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 78.47% 78.47%
=======================================
Files 177 177
Lines 45391 45391
=======================================
Hits 35620 35620
Misses 9771 9771 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Merging this PR will improve performance by ×3.8
|
| Mode | Benchmark | BASE |
HEAD |
Efficiency | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ⚡ | Memory | deep-ingredients/read |
45.1 MB | 4.7 MB | ×9.7 |
| ⚡ | Memory | binary-ingredient-tree/read |
50.8 MB | 15.3 MB | ×3.3 |
| ⚡ | Memory | update-manifests/read |
43.6 MB | 5.6 MB | ×7.8 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | deep-ingredients/read |
834.5 ms | 278.1 ms | ×3 |
| ⚡ | Simulation | binary-ingredient-tree/read |
1,071.9 ms | 773.7 ms | +38.54% |
| ⚡ | Simulation | update-manifests/read |
815.4 ms | 289.7 ms | ×2.8 |
Tip
Curious why this is faster? Comment @codspeedbot explain why this is faster on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.
Comparing gpeacock/release_packages (55bd381) with main (9fb5ef4)2
Footnotes
-
64 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩
-
No successful run was found on
main(6feef8f) during the generation of this report, so 9fb5ef4 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩
ok-nick
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approving given the workflows were verified to work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is it possible to avoid the chocolatey specific code in the CLI repo?
Add cargo-deb and cargo-generate-rpm metadata to cli/Cargo.toml and CI steps to build and upload .deb, .rpm, and .nupkg artifacts to GitHub releases. Add chocolatey/ package template. Update README installation section with Homebrew (macOS/Linux), Chocolatey, .deb, and .rpm instructions.