Skip to content

Update Serving API - from backend PR #5314 - #316

Closed
clllaur wants to merge 1 commit into
main-convertfrom
api-serving-update-5314
Closed

Update Serving API - from backend PR #5314#316
clllaur wants to merge 1 commit into
main-convertfrom
api-serving-update-5314

Conversation

@clllaur

@clllaur clllaur commented Jul 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Updating TS Serving API after the latest changes from backend repo,
PR #5314

@clllaur
clllaur requested a review from a team July 14, 2025 15:02

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @clllaur, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the TypeScript type definitions for the Serving API. These changes are a direct reflection of updates made in a corresponding backend pull request (#5314), ensuring that the frontend types remain synchronized with the latest API contract. The primary focus is on introducing new data structures for file handling and concurrency control, refining existing experience change models for serving purposes, and adjusting project configuration types.

Highlights

  • API Type Additions: New types UploadedFileData and ConcurrencyKey have been introduced. UploadedFileData describes file objects with key, name, and url properties, while ConcurrencyKey is a server-generated hash for optimistic concurrency control.
  • Experience Change Type Refinement: A new union type ExperienceChangeServing has been added, consolidating various serving-specific experience change types. Correspondingly, the changes property within ExperienceVariationConfig now explicitly uses Array<ExperienceChangeServing>. Additionally, an optional concurrency_key field has been added to several ExperienceChange*Data and ExperienceChange*DataUpdate types to support optimistic concurrency.
  • Project Configuration Updates: The documentation for the global_javascript field in ConfigProject has been clarified regarding its behavior with environment-specific code. The environments property has also been removed from the ConfigProject type.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates the TypeScript Serving API types to align with recent backend changes. The main changes include:

  • Adding UploadedFileData and ConcurrencyKey types.
  • Introducing ...Serving variants for ExperienceChange... types, which are used in the ExperienceVariationConfig.
  • Adding an optional concurrency_key to various ExperienceChange... data and update types for optimistic concurrency control.
  • Removing the environments property from ConfigProject.
  • Updating the documentation for global_javascript.

The changes are generally consistent and reflect the intended API update. I've pointed out a few documentation issues, including some copy-paste errors in JSDoc comments and opportunities to improve clarity on new types. Addressing these will improve the maintainability and correctness of the type definitions.

Comment on lines +1125 to +1127
/**
* Object that represents one change done inside an experience
*/

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The JSDoc for ExperienceChangeServing is identical to the one for ExperienceChange. To improve clarity and maintainability, consider making the comment more specific to its purpose. This will help developers understand why there are two similar types.

Suggested change
/**
* Object that represents one change done inside an experience
*/
/**
* Object that represents one change done inside an experience for serving purposes
*/

Comment on lines +1187 to +1189
/**
* Describes structure for "defaultCode" type of experience change
*/

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The JSDoc for ExperienceChangeDefaultCodeDataServing is identical to the one for ExperienceChangeDefaultCodeData. To improve clarity, consider making the comment more specific to its purpose. This pattern of duplicated documentation for new ...Serving types appears in other places in this file; please consider applying a similar fix there as well.

Suggested change
/**
* Describes structure for "defaultCode" type of experience change
*/
/**
* Describes structure for "defaultCode" type of experience change for serving
*/

Comment on lines +1384 to +1386
/**
* Describes structure for "defaultCode" type of experience change
*/

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

There appears to be a copy-paste error in this JSDoc. The comment describes a "defaultCode" type of change, but it's for ExperienceChangeRichStructureDataServing, which should be for a "richStructure" type.

Suggested change
/**
* Describes structure for "defaultCode" type of experience change
*/
/**
* Describes structure for "richStructure" type of experience change
*/

Comment on lines +1447 to +1449
/**
* Describes structure for "defaultCode" type of experience change
*/

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

There appears to be a copy-paste error in this JSDoc. The comment describes a "defaultCode" type of change, but it's for ExperienceChangeCustomCodeDataServing, which should be for a "customCode" type.

Suggested change
/**
* Describes structure for "defaultCode" type of experience change
*/
/**
* Describes structure for "customCode" type of experience change
*/

@abbaseya abbaseya closed this Sep 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants