Skip to content

Conversation

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member

P2795R5, approved in March, 2024, added the [[indeterminate]] attribute, but neglected to amend the table of attributes supported by __has_cpp_attribute.

P2795R5, approved in March, 2024, added the [[indeterminate]]
attribute, but neglected to amend the table of attributes
supported by __has_cpp_attribute.
@tkoeppe
Copy link
Contributor

tkoeppe commented Mar 26, 2025

Huh, what an oversight! This should have spent a lot more time in CWG...

@timsong-cpp
Copy link
Contributor

Heh, the last time something like this came up (for [[assume]]), it was reported here first and made into a core issue. So this time I tried to report a core issue directly and it's being handled editorially...

No objections to this course of action though.

@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

Heh, the last time something like this came up (for [[assume]]), it was reported #5740 and made into a core issue.

We're consistently inconsistent.

But maybe someone (@hubert-reinterpretcast?) prefers this as a core issue for visibility.

@hubert-reinterpretcast
Copy link
Contributor

But maybe someone (@hubert-reinterpretcast?) prefers this as a core issue for visibility.

This isn't really editorial. Also, implementers might be working from the adopted paper and having the core issue will put the __has_cpp_attribute update on the radar.

@jensmaurer jensmaurer added cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking. labels Mar 27, 2025
@jensmaurer
Copy link
Member Author

CWG3020

@jensmaurer jensmaurer changed the title [tab:cpp.cond.ha] Add attribute 'indeterminate' [tab:cpp.cond.ha] Add attribute 'indeterminate' CWG3020 Mar 27, 2025
@jensmaurer jensmaurer requested a review from tkoeppe June 24, 2025 20:19
@tkoeppe tkoeppe closed this in #7984 Jul 7, 2025
@jensmaurer jensmaurer deleted the c92 branch December 15, 2025 08:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cwg Issue must be reviewed by CWG. not-editorial Issue is not deemed editorial; the editorial issue is kept open for tracking.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants