Skip to content

[temp.constr.concept] Avoid talking about normalization of constraints #7790

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
lprv wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[temp.constr.concept] Avoid talking about normalization of constraints #7790

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion source/templates.tex
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -1845,7 +1845,7 @@
\tcode{CD} is satisfied if \tcode{CI$''$} is satisfied.
\begin{note}
Checking whether \tcode{CI$''$} is satisfied
can lead to further normalization of concept-dependent constraints.
can lead to further satisfaction checking of concept-dependent constraints.
\end{note}
%FIXME: "_" in the example below is not a valid identifier.
\begin{example}
Expand Down