-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
chore: add pragma: no cover
to ignore test
#76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #76 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 89.61% 92.00% +2.38%
==========================================
Files 3 3
Lines 77 75 -2
==========================================
Hits 69 69
+ Misses 8 6 -2 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
WalkthroughCoverage exclusion comments were added to specific print statements in the Changes
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
cpp_linter_hooks/clang_tidy.py (1)
34-36
: Consider routing diagnostic output tostderr
(or usinglogging
) instead ofstdout
.
print(output) # pragma: no cover
writes diagnostics to stdout, which can mix with the actual clang-tidy output that calling tools may parse. Forwarding tosys.stderr
(or adopting thelogging
module) keeps channels separated and avoids surprising consumers, while the# pragma: no cover
annotation can stay unchanged.@@ - if retval != 0: - print(output) # pragma: no cover + if retval != 0: + import sys # local import to avoid polluting the module namespace + print(output, file=sys.stderr) # pragma: no covercpp_linter_hooks/clang_format.py (1)
34-37
: Mirror stderr routing for consistency with other hooks.As with the clang-tidy hook, sending non-zero-return diagnostics to
stderr
avoids polluting regular output and aligns with typical CLI conventions. The coverage-exclusion comment can remain.@@ - if retval != 0: - print(output) # pragma: no cover + if retval != 0: + import sys # local import keeps the public surface unchanged + print(output, file=sys.stderr) # pragma: no cover
Summary by CodeRabbit