Add rsHSPF requirement when rsType = ASHPPM.

[nathancoliver]

Description

I tried creating an RSYS object with rsType = ASHPPM. I got the following error.

S0497: 'rsHSPF' missing: required when rsType=ASHPPM

I noticed the docs did not mention rsHSPF is required when rsType = ASHPPM, so I fixed it.

Author Progress Checklist:

• Open draft pull request
  • Make title clearly understandable in a standalone change log context
  • Assign yourself the issue
  • Add at least one label (enhancement, bug, or maintenance)
  • Link the issue(s) addressed by this PR (under "Development" in the sidebar menu)
• Make code changes (if you haven't already)
• Self-review of code
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have added comments to my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have only committed the necessary changes for this fix or feature
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have ensured that my fix is effective or that my feature works as intended by:
    • exercising the code changes in the test framework, and/or
    • manually verifying the changes (as explained in the the pull request description above)
  • My changes pass all local tests
  • My changes successfully passes CI checks
  • Add any unit test for proof and documentation.
  • Merge in main branch and address resulting conflicts and/or test failures.
• Move pull request out of draft mode and assign reviewers
• Iterate with reviewers until all changes are approved
  • Make changes in response to reviewer comments
  • Merge in main branch and address resulting conflicts and/or test failures.
  • Re-request review in GitHub

Reviewer Checklist:

• Read the pull request description
• Perform a code review on GitHub
• Confirm all CI checks pass and there are no build warnings
• Pull, build, and run automated tests locally
• Perform manual tests of the fix or feature locally
• Add any review comments, if applicable
• Submit review in GitHub as either
  • Request changes, or
  • Approve
• Iterate with author until all changes are approved

[nealkruis]

I think the better fix here would be to remove the requirement in the code. @chipbarnaby?

[chipbarnaby]

I just merged Nathan's change. But I agree removing the requirement would be better. I have added an issue for that so I won't forget to make the change.

…

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 12:44 PM Neal Kruis ***@***.***> wrote: *nealkruis* left a comment (cse-sim/cse#593) <#593 (comment)> I think the better fix here would be to remove the requirement in the code. @chipbarnaby <https://github.com/chipbarnaby>? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#593 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ACWGW7HJREC6TWNK7Y6C7E34HEPQ7AVCNFSM6AAAAACR6B75PSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTONRRGEZDOMJXHA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>