Update github runners to oci gh arc runners

[koksay]

Description

CNCF has hosted ephemeral GitHub runners on Oracle that we want projects to use instead of the GitHub-hosted ones, which now incur a cost to use.

Please direct any questions to me, @jeefy, @krook, and @RobertKielty. (or #cncf-ci-infra channel on the CNCF Slack)

[artur-ciocanu]

@cicoyle could you please take a look, I am not sure how CNCF handles this and how Dapr Java SDK should be affected.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.42%. Comparing base (d759c53) to head (d2fef20).
Report is 136 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1326      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     76.91%   77.42%   +0.50%     
- Complexity     1592     1764     +172     
============================================
  Files           145      204      +59     
  Lines          4843     5368     +525     
  Branches        562      587      +25     
============================================
+ Hits           3725     4156     +431     
- Misses          821      899      +78     
- Partials        297      313      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[cicoyle]

Hello @koksay - thanks for the PR here. Mind providing a link to a discussion or where I may find more information about the reason for this change?

Was there a particular reason for the dapr/java-sdk being chosen for this change? From a dapr ecosystem perspective, we will want consistency across all SDKs.

[koksay]

Hi @cicoyle, the main reason is the cost of the runners (for some projects, it's runners on Equinix), and we're visiting all CNCF projects for this change. @jeefy can provide more information here, or you can also join the #cncf-ci-infra channel on the CNCF Slack and ask any questions you may have.

[cicoyle]

inix), and we're visiting all CNCF projects for this chang

Will join and ask for clarification in the slack channel and provide additional context here for future reference

[artur-ciocanu]

@cicoyle is this still relevant? I am wondering if we could close this PR.

[artur-ciocanu]

@cicoyle @salaboy could follow up with someone from CNCF and figure what can we do here and if we should do anything.

[koksay]

Hey @artur-ciocanu, sorry — I didn't follow up on this PR. It's still relevant, for sure. As I stated at the beginning, these runners are no longer free, and we need to move all of them to the CNCF-hosted runners. I think

@cicoyle mentioned on Slack that you prefer to align all SDKs; you may move the others as well. Here are the runner types:

# amd64
oracle-vm-2cpu-8gb-x86-64
oracle-vm-4cpu-16gb-x86-64
oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-x86-64
oracle-vm-16cpu-64gb-x86-64
oracle-vm-24cpu-96gb-x86-64
oracle-vm-32cpu-128gb-x86-64

# arm64
oracle-vm-2cpu-8gb-arm64
oracle-vm-4cpu-16gb-arm64
oracle-vm-8cpu-32gb-arm64
oracle-vm-16cpu-64gb-arm64
oracle-vm-24cpu-96gb-arm64
oracle-vm-32cpu-128gb-arm64

cc: @jeefy