Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CNDB-12781: POC: Read from storage in parallel when reading from multiple iterators (DO NOT MERGE) #1554

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

eolivelli
Copy link

@eolivelli eolivelli commented Feb 7, 2025

What is the issue

This is a POC to see the impact of issuing parallel reads from storage while consuming many iterators at once.

The intent is to improve latency when the storage service is enabled, because in that case reads are sent in parallel to multiple nodes

What does this PR fix and why was it fixed

...

see https://github.com/riptano/cndb/issues/12781

@eolivelli eolivelli changed the title POC: Read from storage in parallel when reading from multiple SSTables (DO NOT MERGE) POC: Read from storage in parallel when reading from multiple iterators (DO NOT MERGE) Feb 7, 2025
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2025

Checklist before you submit for review

  • Make sure there is a PR in the CNDB project updating the Converged Cassandra version
  • Use NoSpamLogger for log lines that may appear frequently in the logs
  • Verify test results on Butler
  • Test coverage for new/modified code is > 80%
  • Proper code formatting
  • Proper title for each commit staring with the project-issue number, like CNDB-1234
  • Each commit has a meaningful description
  • Each commit is not very long and contains related changes
  • Renames, moves and reformatting are in distinct commits

@eolivelli eolivelli changed the title POC: Read from storage in parallel when reading from multiple iterators (DO NOT MERGE) CNDB-12781: POC: Read from storage in parallel when reading from multiple iterators (DO NOT MERGE) Feb 7, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant