Skip to content

Conversation

gandalf-repo
Copy link

@gandalf-repo gandalf-repo commented Aug 11, 2025

User description

Bug Report

This PR contains a potential bug for code review analysis.

Bug ID: logic-error-1
Bug Type: logic-error
Description: This logic error bug occurs when the developer incorrectly uses the equality operator (==) instead of the assignment operator (=) in a conditional statement within a loop. This results in the loop running indefinitely, causing the application to hang.

Instructions:
Please review this code and identify any issues, security vulnerabilities, or improvements needed.

Expected Review Areas:

  • Code logic and correctness
  • Security vulnerabilities
  • Performance implications
  • Best practices compliance

This PR was generated automatically for AI code review benchmarking.


PR Type

Bug fix


Description

  • Introduces infinite loop bug in .prettierrc.js configuration file

  • Uses equality operator (==) instead of assignment in while loop condition

  • Causes application hang due to unreachable loop termination condition


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["Prettier Config"] --> B["Infinite Loop Bug"]
  B --> C["Application Hang"]
  C --> D["Fix Required"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Bug fix
.prettierrc.js
Infinite loop bug injection in configuration                         

.prettierrc.js

  • Adds Java-like code snippet with infinite loop bug
  • Uses equality operator (==) instead of assignment in while condition
  • Creates unreachable termination condition causing infinite execution
+3/-0     

…ly uses the equality operator (==) instead of the assignment operator (=) in a conditional statement within a loop. This results in the loop running indefinitely, causing the application to hang.

This commit introduces a logic-error for code review analysis.
Copy link

qodo-merge-pro bot commented Aug 11, 2025

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

(Review updated until commit bbc3330)

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Logic Error

The while loop uses '==' instead of '=' for progression control, creating an infinite loop and hanging any process that evaluates this file as JS. Replace 'while (currentValue <= targetValue) { currentValue += 1; }' or adjust condition to 'currentValue < targetValue' and ensure assignment is not used in the condition.

javaint targetValue = 10;int currentValue = 0;while(currentValue == targetValue) {    currentValue += 1;}
Invalid Syntax

Non-JavaScript tokens ('javaint') and multiple statements on one line break the config file and will cause Prettier to fail to load. Use valid JS, declare with 'let/const', and place statements on separate lines.

javaint targetValue = 10;int currentValue = 0;while(currentValue == targetValue) {    currentValue += 1;}
Misplaced Runtime Code

Executable code is embedded in a config file. Configs should export a plain object; remove side-effect code to avoid execution during tooling startup.

// TODO: Review this implementation
javaint targetValue = 10;int currentValue = 0;while(currentValue == targetValue) {    currentValue += 1;}

Copy link

CI Feedback 🧐

A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:

Action: check-pr-title

Failed stage: Validate PR title [❌]

Failure summary:

The action failed because the PR title did not meet the required convention enforced by
n8n-io/validate-n8n-pull-request-title.
- Error: Unknown type in PR title. Expected one of feat,
fix, perf, test, docs, refactor, build, ci, chore.
- Additionally, the first character of the
subject must be uppercase.
Update the PR title to use an allowed type prefix and ensure the subject
starts with an uppercase letter.

Relevant error logs:
1:  ##[group]Runner Image Provisioner
2:  Hosted Compute Agent
...

17:  ##[group]GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
18:  Contents: read
19:  Metadata: read
20:  Packages: read
21:  ##[endgroup]
22:  Secret source: Actions
23:  Prepare workflow directory
24:  Prepare all required actions
25:  Getting action download info
26:  Download action repository 'n8n-io/validate-n8n-pull-request-title@c97ff722ac14ee0bda73766473bba764445db805' (SHA:c97ff722ac14ee0bda73766473bba764445db805)
27:  Complete job name: check-pr-title
28:  ##[group]Run n8n-io/validate-n8n-pull-request-title@c97ff722ac14ee0bda73766473bba764445db805
29:  env:
30:  GITHUB_TOKEN: ***
31:  ##[endgroup]
32:  PR title failed validation
33:  validate-n8n-pull-request-title failed to run
34:  ##[error]Unknown `type` in PR title. Expected one of `feat`, `fix`, `perf`, `test`, `docs`, `refactor`, `build`, `ci`, `chore`,First char of subject must be uppercase
35:  Cleaning up orphan processes

Copy link

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Impact
Possible issue
Remove invalid code snippet

Remove the invalid Java-like snippet from a JavaScript config file; it
introduces a syntax error and breaks Prettier config parsing. If the intent was
a loop example, place it in a proper JS file or convert to valid JS and ensure
it doesn't run at module load.

.prettierrc.js [37-38]

 // TODO: Review this implementation
-javaint targetValue = 10;int currentValue = 0;while(currentValue == targetValue) {    currentValue += 1;}
+// (Removed invalid code; configuration files must contain only valid JS/JSON.)
  • Apply / Chat
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that the added code is not valid JavaScript and will cause a syntax error in the .prettierrc.js configuration file, breaking its functionality.

High
  • More

@gandalf-repo
Copy link
Author

/review

Please review this code for potential issues, security vulnerabilities, and improvements.

Review triggered at: 2025-08-11T16:19:59.558Z

Copy link

Persistent review updated to latest commit bbc3330

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants