skpkg: add CI and issue/PR templates

[stevenhua0320]

@zmx27 Ready for review

[zmx27]

I believe that srxplanar is actually open-source, so it would use the usual skpkg workflow files

[stevenhua0320]

I believe that srxplanar is actually open-source, so it would use the usual skpkg workflow files

Given that it is in private repo, is there any unmodified srxplanar that should be edited here?

[zmx27]

One comment, otherwise this looks good

[zmx27]

You can also set the python_version to 3.13 to avoid the CI failing in future PRs

[zmx27]

I see that pyproject.toml has python 3.12-3.14, but I thought we are releasing everything in 3.11-3.13?

[stevenhua0320]

Yes, you are right. Let's now change it back to 3.11-3.13 because originally we think release with python 3.12-3.14

[zmx27]

We don't need codecov token if we're calling the no-codecov workflow I think

[sbillinge]

This is open source so we want to call codecove

[zmx27]

@sbillinge ready for review

[sbillinge]

THis PR went a bit astray because we got confused about whether this repo was private or public....it is public. So the workflows all need to be the standard ones from scikit-package without changing them. I will close this and we can do it over. @stevenhua0320 you may want to run package create diffpy.xpdfsuite some random place on your computer away from this project, so you can regenerate the exact workflow files that we want, then copy them over to this repo from there. That way we are sure that the workflow files you are getting are the exact ones we want.

We also tried to move to 3.14 but cannot yet because not all our dependencies are moved over so we will keep our pyproject.toml showing 3.11 - 3.13.

[sbillinge]

closing so we can replace with a clean version of the workflows.