A governed memory architecture for AI agents with cross-LLM continuity
"Context is the New Data" - Enterprises spent 30 years learning to govern data. AI context is following the same arc, compressed.
ALTM is a memory infrastructure platform that provides AI agents with persistent, governed, cross-LLM memory capabilities. Unlike simple RAG or vector store solutions, ALTM treats AI context like governed enterprise data - with quality scoring, lineage tracking, retention policies, and full lifecycle management.
Current Status: MVP in testing, running locally in Docker, designed for Kubernetes deployment.
LLM agents suffer from "context rot" - losing learned behaviors, corrections, and institutional knowledge between sessions. Current solutions (RAG, vector DBs, Mem0, Zep) provide retrieval but not governed memory. They lack:
- Semantic structure - What type of memory is this?
- Quality signals - Is this accurate? Useful?
- Lineage tracking - Where did this come from?
- Retention policies - When should this expire?
ALTM uses a 4-store architecture, each optimized for its purpose:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ANY LLM (Claude, GPT, etc.) │
│ │ │
│ ┌─────────▼─────────┐ │
│ │ MCP Server │ (LLM-Agnostic) │
│ └─────────┬─────────┘ │
└──────────────────────────────┼──────────────────────────────────┘
│ HTTPS
┌────────────────▼────────────────┐
│ ALTM PLATFORM │
│ (Docker / Kubernetes) │
│ │
│ ┌──────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │
│ │ Neo4j │ │ Qdrant │ │
│ │ (Graph) │ │ (Vector) │ │
│ └────┬─────┘ └────┬─────┘ │
│ │ │ │
│ ┌────▼─────┐ ┌────▼─────┐ │
│ │ MinIO │ │PostgreSQL│ │
│ │ (Object) │ │ (Audit) │ │
│ └──────────┘ └──────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────┘
Why 4 stores?
| Store | Purpose | Example Queries |
|---|---|---|
| Neo4j | Relationship queries | "What concepts connect to this learning?" |
| Qdrant | Similarity search | "Find semantically related memories" |
| MinIO | Large objects | "Store session transcripts, documents" |
| PostgreSQL | Compliance & audit | "Who accessed what, when?" |
| Capability | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Read-write memory | MCP tools for capture, query, update | Working |
| Learning pipeline | Auto-extract from corrections, sessions | Working |
| Quality scoring | Automatic scoring with decay/promotion | Working |
| Lineage tracking | Full provenance for every memory | Working |
| Session checkpoints | Preserve and restore agent state | Working |
| Context governance | Retention policies, access control | Working |
| LLM-agnostic | Works with Claude, GPT, any LLM | Working |
| Enterprise security | Audit trails, CMMC-ready | Working |
Start a task with Claude. Continue with GPT. Finish with local Llama.
The memory layer maintains identity and context regardless of which model is active. This doesn't exist today.
ALTM is the "Switzerland of AI memory" - neutral, portable, governed.
It's not a poor man's LLM. It's something architecturally different.
| Aspect | More Training Data | What ALTM Does |
|---|---|---|
| Learning | Static weights, fixed at training | Continuous - corrections persist immediately |
| Temporal awareness | "Paris is the capital" (fact) | "Last Tuesday we fixed the auth bug" (episode) |
| Self-correction | Requires retraining millions of params | Single correction → permanent behavior change |
| Knowledge lifecycle | Frozen | Draft → active → deprecated (evolves) |
| Metacognition | None | Quality scores, staleness awareness, lineage |
What this gives an AI that training can't:
- Autobiographical continuity - Maintain identity and goals across sessions. Without it, AI is a brilliant amnesiac reborn every conversation.
- Learning from single examples - Corrections stick immediately. LLM training needs thousands of examples to shift weights.
- Knowledge that can doubt - Quality scoring means the AI knows "this learning is stale" or "this came from a correction, not a guess."
- Separation of reasoning from memory - Mirrors human architecture (prefrontal cortex + hippocampus). This is arguably the right architecture.
| Feature | Mem0 / Zep / LangGraph | ALTM |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | RAG retrieval | Full lifecycle governance |
| Quality | Store & retrieve | Score, decay, deprecate |
| Lineage | None | Know where knowledge came from |
| Promotion | Flat storage | Idea → Learning → Skill → Policy |
| Cross-LLM | Tied to one model | LLM-agnostic, portable identity |
| Enterprise | Basic multi-tenant | Hive mind, team knowledge flow |
| Security | Basic | Audit trails, CMMC-ready |
| Solution | Memory | Governance | LLM-Agnostic | Enterprise Security |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mem0 | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Zep | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| LangGraph | Partial | No | Yes | No |
| OpenClaw | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| ALTM | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Enterprises spent 30 years learning to govern data:
| Era | Data | AI Context |
|---|---|---|
| Early | Warehouses, no governance | RAG, no governance |
| Middle | Quality initiatives, MDM | Vector DBs, still unstructured |
| Mature | Governance frameworks, lineage | ALTM: quality, lineage, retention |
Whoever builds the governance layer for AI context will own the enterprise AI stack.
- Graph Store: Neo4j (knowledge graphs, relationships)
- Vector Store: Qdrant (semantic similarity search)
- Object Store: MinIO (large objects, transcripts)
- Audit Store: PostgreSQL (compliance, analytics)
- API Layer: MCP (Model Context Protocol) for LLM-agnostic access
- Deployment: Docker (local), Kubernetes (production)
Apache 2.0