Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release/7.0] Update dependencies from dotnet/arcade #83467

Merged

Conversation

dotnet-maestro[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request updates the following dependencies

From https://github.com/dotnet/arcade

  • Subscription: 63d1901b-1575-4ff8-40e1-08da7ef5fc68
  • Build: 20230314.3
  • Date Produced: March 14, 2023 8:16:00 PM UTC
  • Commit: 099bbb071e187ba4e1603004597624e6acae6394
  • Branch: refs/heads/release/7.0
  • Updates to .NET SDKs:
    • Updates sdk.version to 7.0.104
    • Updates tools.dotnet to 7.0.104

…314.3

Microsoft.DotNet.ApiCompat , Microsoft.DotNet.Arcade.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Archives , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Feed , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Installers , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Packaging , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.TargetFramework , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Templating , Microsoft.DotNet.Build.Tasks.Workloads , Microsoft.DotNet.CodeAnalysis , Microsoft.DotNet.GenAPI , Microsoft.DotNet.GenFacades , Microsoft.DotNet.Helix.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.PackageTesting , Microsoft.DotNet.RemoteExecutor , Microsoft.DotNet.SharedFramework.Sdk , Microsoft.DotNet.VersionTools.Tasks , Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitConsoleRunner , Microsoft.DotNet.XUnitExtensions
 From Version 7.0.0-beta.23114.3 -> To Version 7.0.0-beta.23164.3
@dotnet-issue-labeler dotnet-issue-labeler bot added the area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow label Mar 15, 2023
@mmitche
Copy link
Member

mmitche commented Mar 15, 2023

@carlossanlop Can you take a look at these failures?

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

Looking.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

carlossanlop commented Mar 15, 2023

All the failures happen during build. The error message seems to be the same for all:

D:\a\_work\1\s\.dotnet\sdk\7.0.104\Microsoft.Common.CurrentVersion.targets(2352,5): 
error MSB3270: There was a mismatch between the processor architecture of the project being built "MSIL" and the processor 
architecture of the reference "D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\coreclr\windows.x86.Debug\IL\System.Private.CoreLib.dll", "x86". 
This mismatch may cause runtime failures. Please consider changing the targeted processor architecture of your project through the 
Configuration Manager so as to align the processor architectures between your project and references, 
or take a dependency on references with a processor architecture that matches the targeted processor architecture of your project. 
[D:\a\_work\1\s\src\libraries\System.Private.Uri\src\System.Private.Uri.csproj]
D:\a\_work\1\s\.dotnet\sdk\7.0.104\Microsoft.Common.CurrentVersion.targets(2352,5): 
error MSB3270: There was a mismatch between the processor architecture of the project being built "MSIL" and the processor 
architecture of the reference "D:\a\_work\1\s\artifacts\bin\coreclr\windows.x64.Debug\aotsdk\System.Private.CoreLib.dll", "AMD64". 
This mismatch may cause runtime failures. Please consider changing the targeted processor architecture of your project through the 
Configuration Manager so as to align the processor architectures between your project and references, 
or take a dependency on references with a processor architecture that matches the targeted processor architecture of your project. 
[D:\a\_work\1\s\src\libraries\System.Runtime.InteropServices\src\System.Runtime.InteropServices.csproj]

I'm looking through our backported changes for this month to see if any could be related.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

carlossanlop commented Mar 15, 2023

This has already been manually fixed in the arcade dependency flow for main. Thanks @ViktorHofer and @hoyosjs for pointing to those manually merged commits.

https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/82599/files

I'll manually include those changes here.

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

carlossanlop commented Mar 15, 2023

Ok there were some differences with what we have in main, but I think I figured it out. Differences:

@carlossanlop
Copy link
Member

@mmitche the CI is ok now. The failures seem unrelated, I opened issues to track them:

@carlossanlop carlossanlop merged commit 1e9466d into release/7.0 Mar 15, 2023
@carlossanlop carlossanlop deleted the darc-release/7.0-779860d6-d7f8-4933-8fa5-1aac3416b7bd branch March 15, 2023 22:44
@ghost ghost locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 15, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
area-codeflow for labeling automated codeflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants