Skip to content

Conversation

mcumings
Copy link

@mcumings mcumings commented Aug 20, 2024

Fixes #258.

Adds a new configuration option to allow the consumer to provision of a Predicate<Configuration> instance to customize what Configuration instances should be considered when building the dependency graph.


For your consideration, adding something like this would be very helpful for us. Appreciate the work y'all have done thus far.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Aug 20, 2024

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

…ncy graph creation

Adds a new configuration option to allow the consumer to provision of a
`Predicate<Configuration>` instance to customize what `Configuration` instances
should be considered when building the dependency graph.

# Conflicts:
#	affectedmoduledetector/src/main/kotlin/com/dropbox/affectedmoduledetector/AffectedModuleConfiguration.kt
#	affectedmoduledetector/src/main/kotlin/com/dropbox/affectedmoduledetector/DependencyTracker.kt
#	affectedmoduledetector/src/test/kotlin/com/dropbox/affectedmoduledetector/AffectedModuleConfigurationTest.kt
#	affectedmoduledetector/src/test/kotlin/com/dropbox/affectedmoduledetector/AffectedModuleDetectorImplTest.kt
@mcumings
Copy link
Author

@joshafeinberg - This PR has been sitting around for over a year now. I just rebased it to the latest HEAD. Any chance I could have you folks take a look at this?

Thanks in advance.

@joshafeinberg
Copy link
Member

@joshafeinberg - This PR has been sitting around for over a year now. I just rebased it to the latest HEAD. Any chance I could have you folks take a look at this?

Thanks in advance.

Sorry for the delay, we don't review PRs until the CLA is signed usually which I see you completed a couple days ago. Running against CI and can get this merged if all looks good

@mcumings
Copy link
Author

Yeah, I had signed it initially but IIRC I got failures when attempting to submit the CLA. It seems to still be in a bit of a weird state with 2 comments, only one of which indicates that it had been signed. 🤷‍♂️

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add the ability for some Configuration instances to be excluded
3 participants