fix: add missing amms for jupiter tracking #7131
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅ |
|
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
Hosuke
added
ready-for-review
|
@Hosuke lmk if there are any fixes needed here. Would be great to get this merged |
|
Hey just wanted to follow up here - really excited to get this merged and happy to do whatever necessary to accelerate. |
Hosuke
added
easy
ready-for-final-review
and removed
ready-for-review
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
There are DEXes being routed to through Jupiter which have significant volume (SolFi, Obric V2) that are not currently being tracked. The newly added DEX labels/program ids comes from
https://station.jup.ag/api-v6/get-program-id-to-labelas per existing comments.quick links for more information: