Add option to use futex APIs for spinlock
#149
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
During the discussion of [1] it has been suggested that the congestion could be reduced by relying on C++20 futex APIs. Additionally we incorporated the `try_lock()` design from [2]. [1]: efficient#146 [2]: https://rigtorp.se/spinlock/ Co-authored-by: Milian Wolff <[email protected]>
BurningEnlightenment
force-pushed
the
dev/cxx20_spinlocks
branch
from
0743b37 to
6175e91
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
During the discussion of #146 it has been suggested that the congestion
could be reduced by relying on C++20 futex APIs. Additionally we
incorporated the
try_lock()design from 2.Please note that this hasn't been benchmarked.