Skip to content

Conversation

@shainaraskas
Copy link
Collaborator

... for more targeted review requests and reduced noise

right now, we can't get away from global notifications for the top-level topics in each of these sections because they're not handled as index files in their respective folders. we could move to that model if we want to cut down on noise further.

Also looked at the other folders where I was familiar with the content, and didn't see any clear wins for breaking down ownership further.

@shainaraskas shainaraskas requested a review from a team as a code owner October 23, 2025 16:40
/explore-analyze/visualize/ @elastic/experience-docs

/extend/ @elastic/core-docs
/get-started/ @elastic/core-docs @elastic/project-docs
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@shainaraskas shainaraskas Oct 23, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@elastic/project-docs looks like we have a missing link here (see the error at the top of this file)

I think we need to add your team as a subteam of docs, but we should do whatever we did for core/exp/dev/admin/ingest - I can't see how they were added, but they weren't given direct permissions to this repo

until we do that, your team won't be notified on the files you've marked as co-owned

cc: @georgewallace we will probably need your help here

Copy link
Contributor

@florent-leborgne florent-leborgne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for initiating this. A few of these areas still need to be co-owned, but that's already much better!

Copy link
Contributor

@florent-leborgne florent-leborgne left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM like this - I think safe to merge as is

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants