Skip to content

Conversation

@autoboxer
Copy link

@autoboxer autoboxer commented Oct 26, 2025

Context

WinterCG was officially renamed to WinterTC in early 2025 - article

There was a mix of references throughout the docs, some to the correct WinterTC, and others to the old WinterCG. This PR fixes that.

There were two places that were not updated:

  • blogs/* - it didn't feel appropriate to rewrite history here, but this may be a candidate for updates as well
  • og:description meta blocks

Summary by CodeRabbit

Documentation

  • Updated framework compliance references from WinterCG to WinterTC across integration guides, patterns, and quick-start documentation to reflect current standards.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 26, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates documentation references from "WinterCG" to "WinterTC" across seven markdown files in the docs directory, including blog entries, integration guides, pattern documentation, and quick-start materials. No functional code changes or logic modifications are included.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Blog & Quick Start
docs/blog.md, docs/quick-start.md
Updated framework compliance references from WinterCG to WinterTC in blog detail text and web-standard template description
Integration Docs
docs/integrations/astro.md, docs/integrations/expo.md, docs/integrations/nextjs.md
Updated meta descriptions and descriptive text in integration documentation to reflect WinterTC compliance instead of WinterCG
Pattern Docs
docs/patterns/mount.md, docs/patterns/unit-test.md
Updated descriptive metadata and guidance text from WinterCG to WinterTC compliance terminology

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Changes are purely repetitive documentation updates with identical pattern (WinterCG → WinterTC terminology swap)
  • No logic, control flow, or code semantics affected
  • No public API or exported entity modifications
  • Straightforward text replacements across multiple files with consistent intent

Poem

🐰 Twitching nose with glee so bright,
WinterTC now shines in light,
Docs all dressed in naming new,
From CG to TC, through and through!
Hopping through the pages fair,
Framework compliance everywhere! 🌟

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title "update winterCG to winterTC" is directly related to the main change in the changeset. The PR updates documentation references across multiple files from the outdated "WinterCG" naming to the official "WinterTC" naming convention following the framework's official 2025 rename. The title is concise, clear, and specific enough that a teammate reviewing the commit history would immediately understand that this is a systematic update of a naming convention throughout the documentation, making it an accurate summary of the primary change.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4348b50 and d647f41.

📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • docs/blog.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/integrations/astro.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/integrations/expo.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/integrations/nextjs.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/patterns/mount.md (2 hunks)
  • docs/patterns/unit-test.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/quick-start.md (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/quick-start.md

[grammar] ~351-~351: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...slot:web-standard> Elysia is a WinterTC compliant library, which means if a fram...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

🔇 Additional comments (7)
docs/integrations/expo.md (1)

10-14: Intentional inconsistency: meta description vs og:description blocks.

The meta description (line 10) has been updated to "WinterTC", while the og:description (line 14) remains "WinterCG". This aligns with the PR objectives noting that og:description blocks were not updated. No action needed if this is intentional.

docs/patterns/mount.md (1)

10-10: Terminology update complete and consistent.

All references to WinterCG in descriptive text and meta descriptions have been correctly updated to WinterTC. The og:description block (line 14) was intentionally preserved.

Also applies to: 18-18, 24-24

docs/blog.md (1)

82-82: Terminology update applied to blog entry metadata.

The blog listing for Elysia 0.6 has been correctly updated from "WinterCG framework interlop" to "WinterTC framework interlop".

docs/integrations/nextjs.md (1)

10-10: Terminology updates applied consistently.

Meta description (line 10) and prose text (line 44) have been correctly updated to reference WinterTC compliance. The og:description block (line 14) remains unchanged per PR scope.

Also applies to: 44-44

docs/patterns/unit-test.md (1)

19-19: Terminology update applied to guidance text.

Line 19 correctly reflects the WinterTC standard compliance terminology.

docs/integrations/astro.md (2)

55-55: Apply hyphenation to compound adjective for consistency.

Line 55 reads "Elysia will work normally as expected because of WinterTC compliance." The phrase "WinterTC compliance" is a noun phrase (correct as-is), but if this should align with the adjective form used in other files, consider "WinterTC-compliant" when used as a predicate adjective.

However, "because of WinterTC compliance" is idiomatic and grammatically correct. No change needed here.


10-10: Terminology updates applied consistently.

Meta description (line 10) and prose references (line 60) have been correctly updated to WinterTC. The og:description block (line 14) remains unchanged per PR scope.

Also applies to: 60-60

<template v-slot:web-standard>

Elysia is a WinterCG compliance library, which means if a framework or runtime supports Web Standard Request/Response, it can run Elysia.
Elysia is a WinterTC compliant library, which means if a framework or runtime supports Web Standard Request/Response, it can run Elysia.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Apply hyphenation to compound adjective.

Line 351 reads "WinterTC compliant library". When a compound adjective precedes a noun, it should be hyphenated: "WinterTC-compliant library".

Apply this diff to fix the grammar:

-Elysia is a WinterTC compliant library, which means if a framework or runtime supports Web Standard Request/Response, it can run Elysia.
+Elysia is a WinterTC-compliant library, which means if a framework or runtime supports Web Standard Request/Response, it can run Elysia.

Note: This same pattern ("WinterTC compliant" used as adjective before noun) appears in other files and should also be hyphenated for consistency. Check docs/integrations/astro.md line 55 and docs/integrations/nextjs.md line 44.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
Elysia is a WinterTC compliant library, which means if a framework or runtime supports Web Standard Request/Response, it can run Elysia.
Elysia is a WinterTC-compliant library, which means if a framework or runtime supports Web Standard Request/Response, it can run Elysia.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[grammar] ~351-~351: Use a hyphen to join words.
Context: ...slot:web-standard> Elysia is a WinterTC compliant library, which means if a fram...

(QB_NEW_EN_HYPHEN)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/quick-start.md around line 351, change the phrase "WinterTC compliant
library" to "WinterTC-compliant library" (hyphenate the compound adjective
before the noun); also update the same pattern for consistency in
docs/integrations/astro.md around line 55 and docs/integrations/nextjs.md around
line 44 by replacing "WinterTC compliant" with "WinterTC-compliant".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant