Week1 #1
Week1 #1
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@avr2002 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 6 minutes and 15 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces a comprehensive set of changes to a machine learning project focused on house price prediction. The modifications span multiple files, including workflow configurations, a new Makefile, README updates, Databricks notebooks, project configuration, data processing, model training, and utility functions. The changes aim to improve project structure, add data preprocessing and modeling capabilities, and enhance code quality through linting and configuration management. Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant DataProcessor
participant PriceModel
participant Utils
User->>DataProcessor: Load and preprocess data
DataProcessor-->>User: Processed data
User->>PriceModel: Train model
PriceModel-->>User: Trained model
User->>PriceModel: Predict prices
PriceModel-->>User: Predictions
User->>Utils: Visualize results
Utils-->>User: Visualization
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Nitpick comments (21)
Makefile (1)
1-20: LGTM! Consider adding .PHONY targets.The Makefile is well-structured with clear documentation and focused targets. Each target appropriately delegates to the run.sh script.
Consider adding
.PHONYdeclarations to explicitly mark targets that don't create files:+.PHONY: clean lint lint-ci install help clean: bash run.sh cleanrun.sh (1)
35-54: Consider safeguarding the clean function.The clean function handles file deletion. While it has safety measures (avoiding env directory), additional safeguards could be beneficial.
Consider these improvements:
- Add a confirmation prompt for interactive use
- Add a dry-run option
- Verify current directory is project root
function clean { + # Verify we're in project root + if [[ ! -f "pyproject.toml" ]]; then + echo "Error: Must run from project root" + exit 1 + fi + + # Add --dry-run flag support + if [[ "$1" == "--dry-run" ]]; then + echo "Would remove the following:" + find . \( -name "*cache*" -o -name "*.dist-info" \) -not -path "*env*/*" -print + return + fi + rm -rf dist build coverage.xml test-reports # ... rest of the function }README.md (2)
10-12: Improve clarity in PR submission instructions.The sentence about PR submission could be clearer.
Consider this revision:
-To submit the deliverable, create a feature branch in that repository, and a PR to main branch. +To submit the deliverable, create a feature branch in that repository, and create a PR to the main branch.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~11-~11: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... branch in that repository, and a PR to main branch. The code can be merged after we...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
Line range hint
16-27: Consider enhancing environment setup instructions.While the setup instructions are functional, they could be more comprehensive.
Consider adding:
- Prerequisites section (Python 3.11, UV)
- Troubleshooting steps
- Verification steps to ensure setup was successful
Example addition:
### Prerequisites - Python 3.11 - UV package manager ### Verification After setup, verify your environment: ```bash uv pip list # Should show all required packages python -c "import sys; assert sys.version_info >= (3, 11)" # Verify Python version<details> <summary>🧰 Tools</summary> <details> <summary>🪛 LanguageTool</summary> [uncategorized] ~11-~11: You might be missing the article “the” here. Context: ... branch in that repository, and a PR to main branch. The code can be merged after we... (AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE) </details> <details> <summary>🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)</summary> 17-17: null Bare URL used (MD034, no-bare-urls) </details> </details> </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/house_price/config.py (3)</summary><blockquote> `1-2`: **Consider adding explicit type checks or validations.** While using Pydantic ensures a good amount of validation, you might want to include additional checks (e.g., whether lists are non-empty) if some fields are strictly required. --- `3-4`: **Handle file parsing errors with caution.** Importing yaml is fine, but consider handling file-not-found or YAML parsing errors in a more controlled way (e.g., custom exception messages) for improved debugging in production scenarios. --- `7-21`: **Expand docstrings to clarify usage.** The `ProjectConfig` class is straightforward, but adding more docstrings on permissible values and usage examples can ease maintenance for new contributors. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/house_price/utils.py (2)</summary><blockquote> `5-14`: **Add function docstrings or usage comments.** While the plotting function is clear, it’s good practice to provide docstrings on correct calling sequences, explanation of parameters, and usage examples, especially for maintainability. --- `27-28`: **Consider input validations or disclaimers.** If this function is used in a pipeline, ensure that callers know the return shape is scaled predictions. Possibly include boundary checks or docstrings to prevent confusion if combined with other transformations. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/house_price/price_model.py (3)</summary><blockquote> `6-21`: **Enable flexible model hyperparameters.** Currently, the model’s hyperparameters are read from config["parameters"], which is good. Consider logging or printing these values so that experiments can be tracked easily. --- `23-25`: **Consider cross-validation or data partitioning strategies.** A simple train/test might not always suffice for robust evaluation. Integrating cross-validation or a hold-out validation set can further validate the model’s performance. --- `29-34`: **Document metric usage.** Mean Squared Error (MSE) and R² are common regression metrics. Consider clarifying in a docstring or logs why these metrics are chosen for the business context, and possibly add other relevant ones for deeper insights. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>src/house_price/data_processor.py (4)</summary><blockquote> `12-15`: **Consider validating input DataFrame.** Although this constructor straightforwardly assigns the inputs to instance variables, consider adding checks to ensure that the provided DataFrame and config object meet your project's expectations (e.g., required columns present, or config fields properly set). --- `29-33`: **Ensure robust numeric feature handling.** You rely on casting to numeric with "errors='coerce'". This can silently turn problematic values into NaN. If those columns are critical, consider logging or raising warnings for unexpected type conversions. --- `60-62`: **Add docstring clarification for Spark usage.** Since saving to a Databricks table is heavily Spark-dependent, consider expanding the docstring to mention prerequisites (e.g., Spark session availability, Databricks environment readiness) to clarify usage. --- `79-87`: **Consider verifying change data feed usage.** Enabling delta.enableChangeDataFeed is powerful, but ensure that downstream pipelines or consumers rely on this feature. Document the rationale for enabling it, so future maintainers know its purpose. </blockquote></details> <details> <summary>notebooks/week1/week1. ugly_notebook.py (2)</summary><blockquote> `26-29`: **Remove the final expression or assign it.** Static analysis flagged line 29 as a useless expression: “df”. If it’s only for visual inspection, you can remove it or display it in Markdown. Otherwise, assign it to a variable or show it explicitly in the notebook. ```diff🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
29-29: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
(B018)
73-77: Use caution with “object” dtype.
Categorical detection is done by checking for dtype “object”. While acceptable, some columns might be “object” for non-categorical reasons (like mixed numeric/string data). Clarify or enforce column usage if possible.notebooks/week1/week1. prettier_notebook.py (2)
33-40: Consider passing the filepath as a parameter.
The function “load_data” references a hard-coded path variable, but it’s also called with a filepath argument. This is consistent, but ensure any references to paths are consistent across the notebook and the rest of the project.
52-65: Extended docstring for clarity.
Your docstring in “preprocess_data” is concise. Consider clarifying or exemplifying the effect of transformations on a sample row—particularly the difference between numeric and categorical.notebooks/week1/week1. pretty_notebook.py (1)
18-18: Hard-coded CSV file path.
Using an absolute or environment-dependent path can make the notebook less portable and flexible. You might consider passing the data path via a configuration entry.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
data/data.csvis excluded by!**/*.csvuv.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks)Makefile(1 hunks)README.md(1 hunks)notebooks/week1/week1. prettier_notebook.py(1 hunks)notebooks/week1/week1. pretty_notebook.py(1 hunks)notebooks/week1/week1. ugly_notebook.py(1 hunks)pyproject.toml(3 hunks)run.sh(1 hunks)src/house_price/config.py(1 hunks)src/house_price/data_processor.py(1 hunks)src/house_price/price_model.py(1 hunks)src/house_price/utils.py(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
notebooks/week1/week1. ugly_notebook.py
29-29: Found useless expression. Either assign it to a variable or remove it.
(B018)
🪛 Shellcheck (0.10.0)
run.sh
[error] 64-64: Double quote array expansions to avoid re-splitting elements.
(SC2068)
🪛 LanguageTool
README.md
[uncategorized] ~11-~11: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ... branch in that repository, and a PR to main branch. The code can be merged after we...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
run.sh (2)
1-9: LGTM! Script setup follows best practices.
Good use of:
- Shebang line
set -efor error handling- Clean directory path resolution
16-20: Verify uv installation and consider error handling.
The install function assumes uv is available. Consider adding a check for its presence.
Consider adding error handling:
function install {
+ if ! command -v uv &> /dev/null; then
+ echo "Error: uv is not installed. Please install it first."
+ exit 1
+ fi
uv pip install --upgrade pip
uv pip install --editable "$THIS_DIR/[dev]"
}✅ Verification successful
uv is documented and required - error handling recommended
The README.md clearly documents that uv is a requirement for the project and provides installation instructions (https://docs.astral.sh/uv/getting-started/installation/). While uv is an explicit requirement, adding error handling as suggested in the review would improve user experience by providing a clear message when uv is not installed.
- The error handling suggestion in the review comment is appropriate and should be implemented:
function install {
+ if ! command -v uv &> /dev/null; then
+ echo "Error: uv is not installed. Please install it first."
+ exit 1
+ fi
uv pip install --upgrade pip
uv pip install --editable "$THIS_DIR/[dev]"
}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if uv is mentioned in project documentation
rg -l "uv" README.md pyproject.toml docs/
Length of output: 97
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check content of README.md for uv mentions and installation instructions
rg -i "uv" README.md -C 2
# Check if there are any other shell scripts that might install uv
fd -e sh -x grep -l "uv"
# Check pyproject.toml content for any uv-related configurations
fd pyproject.toml -x cat {}
Length of output: 1473
src/house_price/data_processor.py (3)
44-48: Categorical type assignment.
Casting columns to the "category" dtype is helpful for memory optimization; just ensure the consistent usage of category conversions across other data processing modules.
16-27: Caution with median imputation on numeric columns.
You correctly fill missing values in "GarageYrBlt" using median. However, be aware that median might not always reflect the best strategy for columns heavily skewed or with many missing entries. It might be worth validating the distribution or adding configuration options.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather information about the data distribution and missing values in the codebase.
Let me check the content of those notebooks to see if there's any analysis of the imputation strategy.
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response:
Median imputation strategy aligns with the project's established preprocessing pipeline
The codebase already uses median imputation as a standard strategy for numeric features through SimpleImputer, as evidenced in both notebook implementations. This consistent approach validates your current implementation for GarageYrBlt. The preprocessing pipeline shows thoughtful consideration of different data types and their handling.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any data analysis or validation of GarageYrBlt distribution
rg -l "GarageYrBlt.*distribution|distribution.*GarageYrBlt"
# Look for any test files or data validation related to GarageYrBlt
fd "test.*\.py|validation.*\.py" --exec rg -l "GarageYrBlt"
# Search for any configuration options related to imputation strategy
rg -l "imputation|impute.*strategy|fill.*strategy"
# Look for any data quality checks or analysis
ast-grep --pattern 'def $_(self):
$$$
["GarageYrBlt"]
$$$'
Length of output: 325
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of notebooks for imputation strategy analysis
rg -A 5 -B 5 "imputation|impute.*strategy|fill.*strategy" "notebooks/week1/week1. ugly_notebook.py" "notebooks/week1/week1. prettier_notebook.py"
# Look for any data analysis or statistical checks on GarageYrBlt
rg -A 5 -B 5 "GarageYrBlt" "notebooks/week1/week1. ugly_notebook.py" "notebooks/week1/week1. prettier_notebook.py"
Length of output: 2751
50-53: Validate reliant columns in final dataset.
You explicitly keep cat_features, num_features, and "Id" plus the target in the DataFrame. Ensure that every relevant feature or ID column is available in your DataFrame prior to this step, otherwise the code may raise KeyErrors.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate shell scripts to verify the availability of columns in the DataFrame.
This will help us:
- Find where cat_features and num_features are defined
- Find all column accesses to verify if they exist before the filtering
- Understand how the target column is configured
Let me try another search to find more context about the columns and configuration.
This will help us understand:
- How the configuration is structured
- Where the DataFrame is initially loaded
- Column access patterns in the data processor
Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:
Column validation is properly handled through configuration
The code is well-structured with all required columns (numeric features, categorical features, target, and Id) being defined in ProjectConfig and passed to the DataProcessor during initialization. The DataFrame is received as a constructor parameter, allowing for validation before this filtering step. Since the features are configuration-driven and the DataFrame is pre-loaded, this is a safe approach.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of cat_features and num_features
rg -A 5 "cat_features\s*=|num_features\s*=" src/house_price/data_processor.py
# Search for any DataFrame column access or manipulation
rg "\[[\'\"].*?[\'\"]\]" src/house_price/data_processor.py
# Look for the config definition to find target column
rg "target" src/house_price/config.py src/house_price/data_processor.py
Length of output: 1080
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for the configuration of features
rg -A 10 "class.*Config" src/house_price/config.py
# Find where the DataFrame is initially loaded/created
rg -A 5 "def.*__init__|read_csv|load" src/house_price/data_processor.py
# Fix the previous regex to find column access patterns
rg -l "\\[['\"](.*?)['\"]\\]" src/house_price/data_processor.py
Length of output: 857
notebooks/week1/week1. ugly_notebook.py (1)
38-39: Retaining rows with missing target.
You drop rows missing "SalePrice". Confirm whether partial data might still be useful for other tasks. If not, this approach is valid. If it might hold predictive value, consider a more nuanced approach.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the codebase to understand the context better and verify if dropping rows with missing SalePrice is appropriate.
Let me try to find the correct notebook file path first.
Now let's look at the notebook content with the correct path.
Dropping rows with missing SalePrice is appropriate in this context
The approach to drop rows with missing SalePrice values is valid because:
- SalePrice is the target variable for this regression problem
- The notebook implements a supervised learning pipeline using RandomForestRegressor
- The remaining features with missing values are properly handled in the preprocessing pipeline using SimpleImputer
- Partial data without the target variable cannot be used for training or evaluation in this supervised learning context
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first look at the notebook content to understand the data analysis context
cat "notebooks/week1/week1.ugly_notebook.py"
Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find the notebook file with a similar name
fd "ugly_notebook" --type f
Length of output: 67
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# View the notebook content to understand the data analysis context
cat "notebooks/week1/week1. ugly_notebook.py"
Length of output: 3718
notebooks/week1/week1. prettier_notebook.py (2)
172-186: Confirm feature name consistency.
When retrieving feature names with “get_feature_names_out()”, ensure they align with any downstream processes (like manual naming or mapping). A mismatch in feature name references may cause confusion in model interpretability.
67-68: Review dropping NaN target logic.
Similar to the other notebook, ensure that dropping rows with missing target is the intended strategy. Sometimes, these can be valuable for certain forms of incomplete data analysis.
pyproject.toml (2)
6-6: Wider Python requirement allows better flexibility.
Raising your requirement to “>=3.11” is beneficial for new features and security improvements. Just confirm your environment or deployment targets easily accommodate Python 3.11+.
19-19: pydantic dependency added.
Ensure “pydantic>=2.10.4” is justified or consistent with your usage (e.g., if you need newer features or bug fixes). If backward compatibility is a concern, consider pinning to a minor version range.
notebooks/week1/week1. pretty_notebook.py (2)
3-8: No immediate issues found with imports.
The imports are clear, and the references to modules (data_processor, price_model, and utils) look well-structured.
13-14: Verify that test data doesn’t contain PII or sensitive user data upon printing/visualization.
While printing shapes and minimal metrics is typically fine, please ensure that any actual data printed or visualized in logs or the notebook does not contain private data. This is especially relevant when dealing with real user data.
Also applies to: 43-44
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate some shell scripts to investigate the data handling and potential PII exposure.
This will help us:
- Examine any data files in the week1 directory
- Check print statements and their context
- Look for common PII-related patterns in the code
Let me check the configuration and data loading parts to better understand what data is being handled.
Based on the investigation, I can now generate the final response:
The code appears to handle house price data without PII exposure
The code only prints and visualizes:
- Configuration settings from project_config.yml
- Dataset shapes and dimensions
- Model metrics (MSE, R2 score)
- Feature importance plots
- Actual vs predicted house prices scatter plots
The data source appears to be housing-related data (house_prices/data/data.csv) with no indication of personal information being exposed in the visualizations or print statements. The feature importance plots and model evaluations focus on house characteristics rather than personal data.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Error: No shell scripts found
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for potential data files and their content patterns
fd -e csv -e json -e yaml -e yml -e txt -e parquet -e pickle -e pkl . notebooks/week1 --exec head -n 5 {} \;
# Look for print statements and data visualization in the notebook
rg "print\(" notebooks/week1 -A 2
# Search for common PII patterns in data handling
rg -i "user|email|name|address|phone|ssn|social|password|credit|account" notebooks/week1
Length of output: 3208
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check configuration file contents and data loading
rg -A 5 "config" notebooks/week1
rg -A 5 "load_data|read_csv|pd\." notebooks/week1
# Look for any data visualization or plotting code
rg -A 5 "plt\.|plot|figure|scatter" notebooks/week1
Length of output: 8552
| TIMEFORMAT="Task completed in %3lR" | ||
| time ${@:-help} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix shellcheck warning about array expansion.
The script execution line has a potential issue with array handling.
Apply this fix:
-time ${@:-help}
+time "${@:-help}"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| TIMEFORMAT="Task completed in %3lR" | |
| time ${@:-help} | |
| TIMEFORMAT="Task completed in %3lR" | |
| time "${@:-help}" |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Shellcheck (0.10.0)
[error] 64-64: Double quote array expansions to avoid re-splitting elements.
(SC2068)
| def plot_feature_importance(feature_importance, feature_names, top_n=10): | ||
| plt.figure(figsize=(10, 6)) | ||
| sorted_idx = np.argsort(feature_importance) | ||
| pos = np.arange(sorted_idx[-top_n:].shape[0]) + 0.5 | ||
| plt.barh(pos, feature_importance[sorted_idx[-top_n:]]) | ||
| plt.yticks(pos, feature_names[sorted_idx[-top_n:]]) | ||
| plt.title(f"Top {top_n} Feature Importance") | ||
| plt.tight_layout() | ||
| plt.show() | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Optimize for non-interactive environments.
Plotting functions often fail silently or hang in headless or CI environments. Consider either returning the figure object before plt.show() or adding an optional flag to suppress visual output.
| def get_feature_importance(self): | ||
| feature_importance = self.model.named_steps["regressor"].feature_importances_ | ||
| feature_names = self.model.named_steps["preprocessor"].get_feature_names_out() | ||
| return feature_importance, feature_names |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Based on the findings, I can now generate the final response:
Add length validation in get_feature_importance()
The feature importance extraction needs validation since the model uses a ColumnTransformer with multiple transformers that could potentially drop or modify features. Add a check to ensure feature_importance and feature_names have matching lengths:
def get_feature_importance(self):
feature_importance = self.model.named_steps["regressor"].feature_importances_
feature_names = self.model.named_steps["preprocessor"].get_feature_names_out()
assert len(feature_importance) == len(feature_names), "Mismatch between feature importance and feature names lengths"
return feature_importance, feature_names🔗 Analysis chain
Add protective checks for get_feature_names_out().
If the preprocessor’s transformer changes or certain features are dropped, the lengths in feature_importance and feature_names might mismatch. A quick assertion or condition could prevent unexpected runtime errors.
Let me check the model pipeline structure and any potential feature dropping to better assess this concern.
Let me check the preprocessor definition to understand the transformations being applied.
Let me try a different approach to find the preprocessor configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Searching for all direct uses of get_feature_names_out to see if there's any mismatch handling.
rg --context 3 "get_feature_names_out"
Length of output: 1636
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for pipeline definition and feature dropping
rg -A 5 "Pipeline\(" src/
rg -A 5 "drop|select_features|remove" src/house_price/
Length of output: 915
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for preprocessor definition and column transformations
rg -B 5 -A 10 "preprocessor =" src/
Length of output: 37
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for ColumnTransformer and feature preprocessing
ast-grep --pattern 'ColumnTransformer($$$)'
rg -B 3 -A 7 "ColumnTransformer|make_column_transformer" src/
Length of output: 1035
| with open("../project_config.yml", "r") as file: | ||
| config = yaml.safe_load(file) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error handling when loading configuration.
If the file is missing or malformed, the code will throw an exception. Consider adding exception handling to improve resilience.
Here’s a possible snippet:
try:
with open("../project_config.yml", "r") as file:
config = yaml.safe_load(file)
except FileNotFoundError as e:
print("Configuration file not found. Please provide config file at ../project_config.yml")
raise e
except yaml.YAMLError as e:
print("Error parsing YAML configuration. Check the file format.")
raise e📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| with open("../project_config.yml", "r") as file: | |
| config = yaml.safe_load(file) | |
| try: | |
| with open("../project_config.yml", "r") as file: | |
| config = yaml.safe_load(file) | |
| except FileNotFoundError as e: | |
| print("Configuration file not found. Please provide config file at ../project_config.yml") | |
| raise e | |
| except yaml.YAMLError as e: | |
| print("Error parsing YAML configuration. Check the file format.") | |
| raise e |
| # Load configuration | ||
| with open("../project_config.yml", "r") as file: | ||
| config = yaml.safe_load(file) | ||
|
|
||
| print("Configuration loaded:") | ||
| print(yaml.dump(config, default_flow_style=False)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potential security risk by printing the entire configuration.
If the configuration file contains sensitive information (e.g., credentials), printing it could expose secrets in logs or stdout. Consider masking or omitting sensitive keys before printing.
Possible approach to mask keys in config:
- print(yaml.dump(config, default_flow_style=False))
+ sanitized_config = {k: ("***" if "secret" in k.lower() else v) for k,v in config.items()}
+ print("Sanitized configuration loaded:")
+ print(yaml.dump(sanitized_config, default_flow_style=False))Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.pre-commit-config.yaml (1)
1-2: Consider using a more robust exclude pattern.The current pattern works but could be made more robust by anchoring the end of the paths:
-exclude: '^notebooks|^tests/resources/' +exclude: '^notebooks/|^tests/resources/'This ensures we only exclude exactly these directories and not paths that might accidentally start with these names.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.pre-commit-config.yaml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.pre-commit-config.yaml (1)
1-2: Verify the impact of excluding notebooks from linting.
While it's common to exclude notebooks from certain checks due to their special format, we should ensure that any Python code within notebooks maintains quality standards.
Let's verify the contents of the notebooks directory:
Consider these alternatives:
- Use nbqa (notebook quality assurance) to lint notebook cells
- Export notebooks to .py files in a separate CI step for quality checks
- Implement notebook-specific linting rules
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
Line range hint
9-26: Consider adding Python version matrix testingWhile the workflow correctly sets up Python 3.11, consider adding a matrix strategy to test against multiple Python versions since your
pyproject.tomlallows for Python versions>=3.11.jobs: lint-format-and-static-code-checks: runs-on: ubuntu-latest + strategy: + matrix: + python-version: ["3.11", "3.12"] steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Install uv uses: astral-sh/setup-uv@v3 - name: Set up Python - run: uv python install 3.11 + run: uv python install ${{ matrix.python-version }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
uv.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(2 hunks)pyproject.toml(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
24-26: Verify the existence of lint-ci target in Makefile
The workflow uses make lint-ci but we need to ensure this target exists and is properly configured.
✅ Verification successful
make lint-ci target is properly configured and functional
The verification shows a complete and well-structured setup:
- Makefile contains the
lint-citarget that callsrun.sh lint:ci run.shimplements thelint:cifunction that runs pre-commit checks with appropriate CI configuration.pre-commit-config.yamlis properly configured with essential hooks for code quality:- Basic file checks (JSON, YAML, TOML, trailing whitespace, etc.)
- Ruff for Python linting and formatting
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Makefile exists and contains lint-ci target
if [ -f "Makefile" ]; then
echo "Makefile found. Checking for lint-ci target..."
grep -A 5 "^lint-ci:" Makefile
else
echo "Error: Makefile not found"
fi
Length of output: 219
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of run.sh to verify the lint:ci command
if [ -f "run.sh" ]; then
echo "=== Content of run.sh ==="
cat run.sh
else
echo "Error: run.sh not found"
fi
Length of output: 1494
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if pre-commit config exists and its content
if [ -f ".pre-commit-config.yaml" ]; then
echo "=== Content of .pre-commit-config.yaml ==="
cat .pre-commit-config.yaml
else
echo "Error: .pre-commit-config.yaml not found"
fi
Length of output: 685
pyproject.toml (2)
23-29: LGTM! Clear separation of optional dependencies
The optional dependencies are well-organized into logical groups:
- databricks: Core Databricks integration dependencies
- notebooks: Jupyter kernel for development
- static-code-qa: Code quality tools
- dev: Comprehensive development environment
34-44: LGTM! Comprehensive linting configuration
The selected rules provide good coverage:
- F: Logical errors and syntax issues
- E/W: Style and potential errors
- B: Common bugs and design problems
- I: Import sorting
| "scipy>=1.14.1, <2", | ||
| "matplotlib>=3.9.2, <4", | ||
| "databricks-feature-engineering>=0.6, <1", | ||
| "pydantic>=2.10.4", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add upper version bound for pydantic
All other dependencies have upper version bounds to prevent breaking changes, but pydantic is missing one.
- "pydantic>=2.10.4",
+ "pydantic>=2.10.4, <3",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "pydantic>=2.10.4", | |
| "pydantic>=2.10.4, <3", |
| dependencies = [ | ||
| "lightgbm>=4.5.0, <5", | ||
| "scikit-learn>=1.5.1, <2", | ||
| "cloudpickle>=3.0.0, <4", | ||
| "mlflow>=2.16.0, <3", | ||
| "numpy>=1.26.4, <2", | ||
| "pandas>=2.2.2, <3", | ||
| "pyarrow>=15.0.2, <16", | ||
| "cffi>=1.17.1, <2", | ||
| "scipy>=1.14.1, <2", | ||
| "matplotlib>=3.9.2, <4", | ||
| "databricks-feature-engineering>=0.6, <1", | ||
| "pydantic>=2.10.4", | ||
| ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Consider adding an upper bound version constraint for pydantic
The codebase uses pydantic's BaseModel for configuration management in a straightforward manner. While the current implementation is compatible with pydantic v2, it's recommended to add an upper bound version constraint (e.g., "pydantic>=2.10.4, <3") to prevent potential breaking changes from future major versions.
src/house_price/config.py: Uses basic pydantic features (BaseModel, type annotations) for configuration management
🔗 Analysis chain
LGTM! Well-organized dependencies with proper version constraints
The dependencies are well-organized and properly versioned with both lower and upper bounds (except pydantic as noted above) to prevent breaking changes while allowing bug fixes.
Let's verify the usage of pydantic in the codebase:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for pydantic model definitions and usage
echo "Searching for pydantic model definitions..."
rg -l "from pydantic import" || echo "No direct pydantic imports found"
rg -l "class.*BaseModel" || echo "No pydantic models found"
Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual pydantic model implementation and usage
echo "Checking pydantic model implementation in config.py:"
cat src/house_price/config.py
Length of output: 753
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Makefilefor project task management, including targets for cleaning, linting, and installation.ProjectConfigclass for structured configuration management.DataProcessorclass for preprocessing housing price data.PriceModelclass for training and evaluating machine learning models.Bug Fixes
Documentation
README.mdfile.Chores
pyproject.toml.run.shscript for managing project tasks.