feat: Update SDK constraints and upgrade deps

[AlexV525]

Changes

1. package:mews_pedantic was upgraded from ^0.26.0 to ^0.27.0 to match the DCM version (v1.17.0). (See changelog)
2. SDK constraints were updated from >=2.x.0 <3.0.0 to ^3.0.0 since package:mews_pedantic implied. (See versions)
3. package:analyzer was constrained to >=5.4.0 <8.0.0 since the SDK constraint implied and no breaking changes to *Element classes within the usages of packages (see versions). Some usages are deprecated and this request ignores them until we rebased to the next major version.
4. package:source_gen was constrained to ">=1.4.0 <3.0.0" since the SDK constraint implied and no breaking changes within the usages of packages. (See versions)
5. package:source_helper was upgraded to "^1.3.4" since the SDK constraint implied. (See versions)
6. package:solana now allows package:decimal v3 to be resolved.
7. package:melos was upgraded from 3.0.0 to 6.3.2.
8. Regenerate files since dependencies were upgraded.

Checklist

• PR is ready for review (if not, it should be a draft).
• PR title follows Conventional Commits guidelines.
• Screenshots/video added.
• Tests added.
• Self-review done.

[ookami-kb]

package:melos can be resolved as any version since the repo has no code usage to the package.

No, melos should have constraints as well. There can be breaking changes between versions, it's not that different from any other dependency in this case.

[AlexV525]

So...I've also upgraded dependencies according to the constraint update, and all generated files are regenerated. I appreciate your input about this big change and will follow up if you want to separate these changes into smaller requests.

[AlexV525]

package:pigeon was not upgraded as I wasn't involved with integration tests and was uncertain about the affection range. That remains as a TODO. But as the SDK constraint implies, it needs to be >=14.0.1.

[AlexV525]

Friendly ping @ookami-kb

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 78.00%. Comparing base (d5b0865) to head (b65f5d2).
Report is 162 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1683      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.64%   78.00%   +0.35%     
==========================================
  Files         189      189              
  Lines        4259     4192      -67     
==========================================
- Hits         3307     3270      -37     
+ Misses        952      922      -30     

Flag	Coverage Δ
solana-beta	78.00% <ø> (?)
solana-stable	78.00% <ø> (+0.35%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[ookami-kb]

@AlexV525 build is failing.

[AlexV525]

@AlexV525 build is failing.

Thanks for the trigger. I'll look into it soon.

[ookami-kb]

And one more thing I've noticed – for solana_mobile_client/example and solana_mobile_wallet/example, pubspec.lock files are updated with https://pub.dev replaced with https://pub.flutter-io.cn. Can you please revert the changes?

Other than that, everything LGTM, thanks for the PR!

[AlexV525]

Locks are updated.

[AlexV525]

The last test workflow seems failed because of a different version of Flutter. I've upgraded to 3.27.4.

[AlexV525]

deprecated_member_use lints are ignored in the espressocash_app until we bump the SDK constraints in the future.

[AlexV525]

The missing import package:retrofit/error_logger.dart has been added (maybe due to retrofit updates).

[ookami-kb]

@AlexV525 merged, thank you!