Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove unused and deprecated func GetEffectiveNodeIdsFromWalEntries #19458

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

1911860538
Copy link

No description provided.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

Hi @1911860538. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jmhbnz
Copy link
Member

jmhbnz commented Feb 21, 2025

/ok-to-test

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 21, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 68.97%. Comparing base (49f34c9) to head (8ce740c).

Additional details and impacted files
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
server/storage/util.go 83.78% <ø> (+2.20%) ⬆️

... and 21 files with indirect coverage changes

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #19458      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.92%   68.97%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         420      420              
  Lines       35753    35751       -2     
==========================================
+ Hits        24642    24660      +18     
+ Misses       9690     9668      -22     
- Partials     1421     1423       +2     

Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 49f34c9...8ce740c. Read the comment docs.

@1911860538
Copy link
Author

@1911860538: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-etcd-integration-1-cpu-amd64 8ce740c link true /test pull-etcd-integration-1-cpu-amd64
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

/retest

Copy link
Member

@ahrtr ahrtr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

Actually there are lots of similar cleanup to be done on main branch. I'd like to do it after we officially release v3.6.0.

  • 3.6.0 is the top priority for now
  • Keeping the main and release-3.6 branches as similar as possible will make cherry-picking easier.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 1911860538, ahrtr

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@1911860538
Copy link
Author

Thanks

Actually there are lots of similar cleanup to be done on main branch. I'd like to do it after we officially release v3.6.0.

  • 3.6.0 is the top priority for now
  • Keeping the main and release-3.6 branches as similar as possible will make cherry-picking easier.

Okay, I won't submit similar pull requests until the release of v3.6.0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants