Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Syscall differential fuzz test #127

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ImTei
Copy link
Collaborator

@ImTei ImTei commented Jan 16, 2025

Description

This PR refactors differential syscall fuzz test.
The existing syscall fuzz tests were implemented as independent fuzz test case for each syscall. In this PR, we made a single entrypoint for every syscall, so make go fuzzer can use corpus from the last, different syscall execution, to allow fuzzer to simulate any combination of arbitrary syscalls.

For now, simply integrated new fuzz tests into the CI with running a bit short time. We're planning to enhance effect of fuzz tests, by managing consistent corpus, long-running dedicated fuzz server, and etc.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 61.82%. Comparing base (3f1f5fc) to head (0642afe).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #127      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   61.63%   61.82%   +0.19%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        4147     4147              
==========================================
+ Hits         2556     2564       +8     
+ Misses       1444     1440       -4     
+ Partials      147      143       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants