Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

op-sepolia: Add task to switch back to singlethreaded cannon. #544

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ajsutton
Copy link
Contributor

@ajsutton ajsutton commented Feb 5, 2025

Description

Add task to switch back to singlethreaded cannon.

Updates the set-game-implementation task to handle recent breaking changes in superchain-registry and the monorepo.

@ajsutton ajsutton requested review from a team as code owners February 5, 2025 04:02
@ajsutton ajsutton requested a review from mbaxter February 5, 2025 04:02
@ajsutton ajsutton requested a review from Ethnical February 6, 2025 00:53
Copy link
Contributor

@mbaxter mbaxter left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for putting this together! Left a few comments on some discrepancies I noticed.

tasks/sep/030-revert-mt-cannon/.env Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tasks/sep/030-revert-mt-cannon/README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
tasks/sep/030-revert-mt-cannon/VALIDATION.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tasks/sep/030-revert-mt-cannon/VALIDATION.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tasks/sep/030-revert-mt-cannon/VALIDATION.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Updates the set-game-implementation task to handle recent breaking changes in superchain-registry and the monorepo.
@ajsutton ajsutton force-pushed the aj/revert-cannon-mt branch from ead701d to ce7ae41 Compare February 7, 2025 01:40

* Set implementation for game type 0 to 0xF3CcF0C4b51D42cFe6073F0278c19A8D1900e856 in `DisputeGameFactory` 0x05F9613aDB30026FFd634f38e5C4dFd30a197Fa1: `setImplementation(0, 0xF3CcF0C4b51D42cFe6073F0278c19A8D1900e856)`
* Set implementation for game type 1 to 0xbbDBdfe37C02439764dE0e41C906e4396B5B3914 in `DisputeGameFactory` 0x05F9613aDB30026FFd634f38e5C4dFd30a197Fa1: `setImplementation(1, 0xbbDBdfe37C02439764dE0e41C906e4396B5B3914)`
<!--NEXT TASK DESCRIPTION-->
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<!--NEXT TASK DESCRIPTION-->
<!--NEXT TASK DESCRIPTION-->

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
# ProxyAdminOwner - Set Dispute Game Implementation
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we should add a link to the version of the contracts used (seems to be the v1.8.0-rc.4 solidity file NestedSignFromJson.s.sol.

In both, there are two changes:

* absolutePrestate() changes from `0x03b7eaa4e3cbce90381921a4b48008f4769871d64f93d113fcadca08ecee503b` to `0x03f89406817db1ed7fd8b31e13300444652cdb0b9c509a674de43483b2f83568`.
These can be verified by comparing to the values in [releases.json](https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimism/blob/develop/op-program/prestates/releases.json).
Copy link
Contributor

@Ethnical Ethnical Feb 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For improving readibility for signers and going faster for reviewers just added the permalink to version 1.4.0.

Suggested change
These can be verified by comparing to the values in [releases.json](https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimism/blob/develop/op-program/prestates/releases.json).
These can be verified by comparing to the values in [releases.json](https://github.com/ethereum-optimism/optimism/blob/be6ca32937c8cd47d08c560dde55bc68142c48cc/op-program/prestates/releases.json#L44).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants