Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix PROV import #26

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2017
Merged

Fix PROV import #26

merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2017

Conversation

stain
Copy link
Contributor

@stain stain commented May 4, 2017

The simpler http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o import (aka http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o.ttl or http://www.w3.org/ns/prov-o.rdf after content negotation) is preferred to http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#. See also #25.

Note that I left the owl:versionIRI as TODO as it would no longer be 2013-02-01 - however OBO redirects straight to master rather than a tag/commit - so accepting this PR would 'break' OBO.

Copy link
Contributor

@hlapp hlapp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See in-line comment. I'd welcome your thoughts (and/or corresponding change) in response. The change is also small enough that if there isn't a better way to do this I'm happy to make the change myself instead of bothering you with it :-)

@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@
This ontology is maintained at http://github.com/miapa/miapa, and requests for changes or additions should be filed at the issue tracker there. The discussion list is at [email protected]. Further resources about MIAPA can be found at the project&apos;s main page at http://evoio.org/wiki/MIAPA.</dc:description>
<dc:creator>Hilmar Lapp</dc:creator>
<owl:imports rdf:resource="&obo;cdao.owl"/>
<owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="&obo;miapa/2013-02-01/miapa.owl"/>
<owl:imports rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#"/>
<owl:versionIRI rdf:resource="&obo;miapa/2017-TODO-TODO/miapa.owl"/>
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we have to have owl:versionIRI, and if we should have it, then I'm thinking shouldn't this just be the unversioned IRI of the ontology, i.e., &obo/miapa/miapa.owl.

I.e., conceptually this change is going to "master", not to a version branch or tag (if one existed). We'd cut a new release off of "master" when ready to do so.

@hlapp hlapp merged commit b06cd46 into evoinfo:master May 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants