chore: Update CODEOWNERS #1984
chore: Update CODEOWNERS #1984
Conversation
Auto-generated CODEOWNERS update based on commit activity over the last 180 days. 🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code) Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. WalkthroughThe Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @flashinfer-bot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request automates the maintenance of the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This PR is an automated update to the CODEOWNERS file based on recent commit history. The changes mostly involve reordering owners and adding a new owner to one path, which is expected from such an automation. My review focuses on improving the conciseness and maintainability of the generated CODEOWNERS file.
I've found a couple of instances of redundant ownership rules where a subdirectory is assigned the exact same owners as its parent directory. Since CODEOWNERS rules are inherited, these specific rules for subdirectories are unnecessary. Removing them would make the file cleaner. I've added specific comments on the lines that can be removed.
For future improvements, it would be beneficial to enhance the generation script (scripts/codeowner_analyzer.py) to automatically detect and consolidate these redundant rules.
| csrc/fused_moe/cutlass_backend/ @yzh119 @yongwww @djmmoss @wenscarl @cyx-6 | ||
| csrc/nv_internal/ @wenscarl @djmmoss @yzh119 @cyx-6 @yongwww | ||
| csrc/fused_moe/ @yzh119 @yongwww @djmmoss @cyx-6 @wenscarl | ||
| csrc/fused_moe/cutlass_backend/ @yzh119 @yongwww @djmmoss @cyx-6 @wenscarl |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line is redundant because the owners for csrc/fused_moe/cutlass_backend/ are identical to the owners of its parent directory csrc/fused_moe/ (defined on line 12). Since GitHub's CODEOWNERS file inherits ownership from parent directories, this line can be removed to make the file more concise without changing the effective owners.
| csrc/nv_internal/include/ @wenscarl | ||
| csrc/nv_internal/tensorrt_llm/ @wenscarl @djmmoss @yzh119 @cyx-6 @yongwww | ||
| csrc/xqa/ @yzh119 @cyx-6 | ||
| csrc/nv_internal/tensorrt_llm/ @wenscarl @djmmoss @cyx-6 @yzh119 @yongwww |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line is also redundant. The owners listed for csrc/nv_internal/tensorrt_llm/ are the same as those for the parent directory csrc/nv_internal/ on line 14. This line can be safely removed to simplify the CODEOWNERS file.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
26-26: Remove duplicate owner entry.The owner
@Anerudhanis listed twice on this line, which appears to be an error in the automated generation script.Apply this diff to remove the duplicate:
-flashinfer/cudnn/ @Anerudhan @yzh119 @cyx-6 @Anerudhan +flashinfer/cudnn/ @Anerudhan @yzh119 @cyx-6
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
.github/CODEOWNERS (2)
12-13: Redundant subdirectory entry still present.Line 13 (
csrc/fused_moe/cutlass_backend/) is redundant because the owners are identical to the parent directory on line 12. Since GitHub's CODEOWNERS inherits ownership from parent directories, this line can be removed.
14-17: Redundant subdirectory entry still present.Line 17 (
csrc/nv_internal/tensorrt_llm/) is redundant because the owners are identical to the parent directory on line 14. This line can be removed per GitHub's CODEOWNERS inheritance rules.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
1-43: Consider improving the automation script quality.While the ownership updates reflect recent commit activity, the automation script has some quality issues:
- It generated a duplicate owner entry (line 26)
- It recreated redundant subdirectory entries (lines 13, 17) that were previously flagged as unnecessary
- These redundant entries persist despite GitHub's CODEOWNERS inheritance model
Consider enhancing the script to:
- Deduplicate owner lists
- Detect and skip subdirectories with identical ownership to their parent
- Optionally incorporate feedback from previous reviews
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/CODEOWNERS(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/CODEOWNERS (2)
18-18: LGTM - ownership update appears reasonable.The updated ownership for
csrc/xqa/to@cyx-6 @yzh119appears to be a legitimate change based on recent commit activity.
30-30: LGTM - ownership update appears reasonable.The updated ownership for
flashinfer/jit/attention/to include@cyx-6alongside the existing owners reflects recent contributions to this module.
Summary
This PR updates the CODEOWNERS file based on git commit history analysis from the last 180 days.
Changes
.github/CODEOWNERSwith current code ownership based on:How to Review
.github/CODEOWNERSNotes
🤖 This PR was automatically generated by the update-codeowners workflow
Summary by CodeRabbit