-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
[video_player] Implements background playback functionality #9212
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thanks for the contribution! Please see https://github.com/flutter/flutter/blob/master/docs/ecosystem/contributing/README.md#changing-federated-plugins for the process to make a multi-package PR, so that our CI can run tests. |
Thanks for the link, I missed that! I might be missing something very obvious here, but I'm not sure how to update so that the remaining checks will complete. From what I understand it fails due to a cached version of
I can get the camera example to run locally, but only if I use direct dependencies instead of overridden dependencies. What's the best approach here? Should I just remove the path-based dependencies for the camera example or is there another way to resolve it? |
@stuartmorgan-g It looks like
@ArvidNy You should be able to fix this by manually adding the rest of the dependencies to the failing plugins. They should look like: dependency_overrides:
video_player: {path: ../../../../packages/video_player/video_player}
video_player_android: {path: ../../../../packages/video_player/video_player_android}
video_player_avfoundation: {path: ../../../../packages/video_player/video_player_avfoundation}
video_player_platform_interface: {path: ../../../../packages/video_player/video_player_platform_interface}
video_player_web: {path: ../../../../packages/video_player/video_player_web} Let me know if that works. |
Yes, the tooling should account for that though.
That shouldn't have been necessary. What command did you run, exactly, to generate what's in the PR now? |
This is the command I ran: dart run script/tool/bin/flutter_plugin_tools.dart make-deps-path-based --target-dependencies=video_player_platform_interface,video_player_android,video_player_avfoundation,video_player,video_player_web |
Oh, and manually adding the rest of the dependency overrides does seem to resolve the issue, at least locally. So I can push that to resolve the PR tests if there's no other obvious fix for it. |
I see the issue; I've filed flutter/flutter#168538 to track it. The best solution in the context of this PR is to revert all the non- |
I have reverted all the changes in the example files in the other packages, but for some reason the tests still fail with those packages from what I can see. Not sure what more to do. Any suggestions or is it possible to review anyway? |
Ah yes, the pathified tests hit the same issue. We can ignore those failures for review; they won't affect the ability to ultimately land the PR since once sub-PRs are split out and landed it won't happen any more. |
This pull request adds the missing implementation for background playback. This allows
video_player
to be used with e.g.audio_service
to continue playing audio after the screen is closed or the app is move to the background. A sample implementation for testing can be found here: https://github.com/ArvidNy/video_player_audio_serviceCloses flutter/flutter#62739
Pre-Review Checklist
[shared_preferences]
pubspec.yaml
with an appropriate new version according to the pub versioning philosophy, or I have commented below to indicate which version change exemption this PR falls under1.CHANGELOG.md
to add a description of the change, following repository CHANGELOG style, or I have commented below to indicate which CHANGELOG exemption this PR falls under1.///
).If you need help, consider asking for advice on the #hackers-new channel on Discord.
Footnotes
Regular contributors who have demonstrated familiarity with the repository guidelines only need to comment if the PR is not auto-exempted by repo tooling. ↩ ↩2 ↩3